English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/tomb/tomb.html

Did they hide or skip original Bible from cave were they found? Documentary claims discovery of tomb of Jesus, wife and son...

2007-03-02 08:16:51 · 6 answers · asked by health_message_to_all 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

There is must be some Bibles documents or some scripts left behind Jesus Tomb and they skipped because today’s Bible scripts different and cause big clouds or revolution comes to Christianity...

2007-03-02 08:29:52 · update #1

I don't say it is false It happen and possible because Jesus was human and no human can alive after some period.

These the last days of earth life lots discover before your new journey start...

2007-03-02 08:35:39 · update #2

6 answers

The Discovery channel is notorious for "documentaries" with no facutal basis.

2007-03-02 08:21:04 · answer #1 · answered by pater47 5 · 1 0

I don't mean to be rude, but many don't consider the fact that early translators were smart. If Egyptians truly built the pyramids then the early bible translation had to have been CORRECT. No Jesus never had a wife, but it is possible that Jesus' coffin was reused after ressurection. I'm pretty sure many people fail to realize words and dialects would have changed. More than likely we are making a corrupted version of the bible.

2007-03-02 09:14:36 · answer #2 · answered by space dreamer 3 · 0 0

It is fiction!

In 1980, in Talpiot (a suburb of Jerusalem), Israel, a construction crew unearthed an ancient tomb. Inside the tomb was discovered ten ossuaries (burial bone boxes). Inscribed on these bone boxes were names. The discovery of the ossuaries was not unusual, as thousands of ancient ossuaries have been discovered in ancient tombs in and around Jerusalem. What was somewhat unusual was the names that were inscribed on the ossuaries: Jesus son of Joseph, Maria, Mariamene, Matthew, Judas son of Jesus, and Jose (likely an abbreviation of Joseph). The similarities of these names to the biblical Jesus and His family has led TV director Simcha Jacobovici and movie producer James Cameron to produce “The Jesus Family Tomb” in both movie and book form. Jacobovici and Cameron are making the claims that the Jesus Family Tomb is indeed the family burial place of Jesus and His family, and that the presence of Jesus’ bones disproves His resurrection. Is there any validity to the claims of the Jesus Family Tomb?
First, before we examine the question biblically, it is important to understand that no influential archaeologist has come forward in agreement with the Jesus Family Tomb project. The curator for anthropology and archeology at the Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem from 1972 to 1997, Joe Zias, states that the project “makes a mockery of the archaeological profession.” Second, the ossuaries cannot conclusively be dated to the 1st century A.D., although they can likely be dated to that approximate time period. Third, there is evidence that the tomb had been disturbed and vandalized. It cannot be verified what was, or what was not, vandalized or stolen. On an archaeological basis alone, there is serious reason to doubt the authenticity of the Jesus Family Tomb project.
Historically and culturally speaking, there is further reasoning to reject the ideas of the Jesus Family Tomb project. The names “Jesus, Maria, Matthew, Judas, and Joseph” were all very common names in 1st century Israel. Some cultural historians estimate that as many as 25% of 1st century Jewish women were named Mary (Miriam). The New Testament confirms this by mentioning six different women named Mary, including three who were prominent in Jesus’ life (Jesus’ mother, Mary Magdalene, and Mary of Bethany). It would not be uncommon for a 1st century Jewish family to have the names Jesus (Yeshua), Mary (Miriam), Joseph, and Judas – as all were very popular Jewish names (due to their background in the Hebrew Scriptures).
Biblically speaking, there are numerous reasons to reject the idea of the Jesus Family Tomb. First, the New Testament consistently states that Jesus’ family was from Nazareth (Matthew 2:13; Luke 2:4,39,51; John 1:45-46). If Jesus’ family had a tomb, it would have very likely been in Nazareth. Second, the Bible describes Jesus and his adopted father Joseph as carpenters (Matthew 13:55; Mark 6:3), likely making them financially poor and of a lower social status. The tomb discovered in Talpiot is the tomb of a wealthy family. Third, the New Testament states that Jesus’ body was buried in a tomb that belonged to Joseph of Arimathea, and that there were witnesses as to where Jesus was buried (Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:43-47; Luke 23:50-54; John 19:38-42). Without even considering the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, the New Testament account paints an entirely different account of Jesus, His family, and His burial. Even secular historians and archaeologists view the New Testament gospels as the best existing historical record of the life of Jesus of Nazareth.
Now, let’s get to the crux of the matter. The true motivation of the Jesus Family Tomb project is to deny the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The subtitle of the book is given as “The Discovery, the Investigation, and the Evidence That Could Change History.” Cameron, Jacobovici, and co-author Pellegrino have a clear agenda. They do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah, that Jesus was God-incarnate, or that Jesus was resurrected after His crucifixion. The discovery of the “Jesus Family Tomb” is simply a convenient basis for their argument, due to the similarities of the names on the ossuaries to the names of Jesus and His family. If it could be proven that the “Jesus Family Tomb” was indeed the tomb of the biblical Jesus of Nazareth and His family, the resurrection would be disproven, thus destroying the very foundation of the Christian faith (see 1 Corinthians chapter 15).
None of the suppositions of the Jesus Family Tomb project can be proven. In fact, the archaeological community is nearly unanimous in condemning the Jesus Family Tomb as a hoax, with no basis in history or archaeology. There is every reason to doubt the claims of the Jesus Family Tomb – archaeologically, historically, and biblically. The Christian faith has nothing to fear from honest and scientific archaeology.

2007-03-02 08:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by chris p 6 · 1 0

Well, the must not the the tomb of Jesus, Jesus didn't have a wife or son. Anyways Jesus rose from the dead, body and all.

2007-03-02 08:22:09 · answer #4 · answered by t2ensie 3 · 1 0

The original bible was hidden and the one which exists now is the corrupted version. The bible was re-written to show that Jesus is a god which is not true. He was human and he was the messenger of God.btw the story bout his wife and son is a false one.

2007-03-02 08:29:28 · answer #5 · answered by leema 1 · 0 1

This was shown to be a fraud almost 30 years ago.

2007-03-02 08:29:33 · answer #6 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers