English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Most of them do, even if they don't know what the ingredients were... they just like it because it tastes good and don't bother thinking about it.

Theologians think long and hard, researching cookbooks & straining their minds trying to recreate the original recipe and debate what the chef must be like.

Fundamentalists claim that only their recipe is the right one and that anybody who eats their dinner in a slightly different way is going to get food poisoning and die.

Atheists think the food was just always here without a chef.

Evolutionary Theorists believe that this meal is really just a casserole made from leftovers of all the previous meals.

The Amish claim that only stone ovens make the meal delicious and electric ones make it taste funny.

Buddhists think the whole meal tastes terrible and would rather just pretend they’re not hungry.

Hindus think the food was the result of many animal-faced, multi-armed monsters warring in the kitchen.

Muslims believe there is only one right way to eat the meal and that those who eat it wrong should be punished… but few can agree which is the correct fork.

Christians say that you’d BETTER like the meal, because the waiter died trying to deliver it… and he died because of something you did.

Jews continue to question “what’s in this meal?” and debate the ingredients at the table. They think the waiter’s a nice guy but he’s probably didn’t cook it.

Mormons think the meal would be best enjoyed eaten with as many wives as they please.

Catholics never really enjoy the meal, but they praise the chef and manage to send a thank-you letter to the waiter’s mother every now and again.

Episcopalians gorge the meal as ravenously as they can on weekdays, but fast on Sunday morning for an hour, then eat some more when they get home.

Taoists enjoy the meal because they think it tastes exactly as it was meant to.

Satanists are still bitter about being fired by the chef long ago and try to trip the waiter as he walks by.

Confucians describe the meal in strange metaphors that make little sense and nod knowingly stroking their beards.

Monotheists think there is only one chef in the whole restaurant while polytheists think there’s a whole team of them.

And scientologists are just plain nuts. They chew on the napkin and call it a meal.

2007-03-02 09:01:34 · answer #1 · answered by DarkLord_Bob 3 · 3 0

I enjoy a cooked meal, but well sounds a little over cooked.

2007-03-02 16:03:04 · answer #2 · answered by Magus 4 · 0 0

I think it's a safe bet that everyone enjoys a well cooked meal. Atheists, Christians, Wiccans, Satanists, Agnositics.

It's pretty universal. Hope that disuades any further pondering on this topic.

2007-03-02 15:59:31 · answer #3 · answered by Jason R 3 · 1 0

Agnostics aren't really sure if they enjoy well-cooked meals.

2007-03-02 16:01:30 · answer #4 · answered by Contemplative Monkey 3 · 2 0

Agnostics aren't sure if they like well-cooked meals or not.

2007-03-02 16:03:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Heh. Who DOESN'T enjoy a well-cooked meal?

Is it possible to enjoy a badly-cooked meal?

2007-03-02 15:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm a spiritualist & I love a well cooked meal

2007-03-02 15:59:35 · answer #7 · answered by Screamin' Banshee 6 · 2 0

Huh? Does it have something to do with the same number it takes to change a light bulb in their "church"?

2007-03-02 16:01:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

47%

2007-03-02 16:00:35 · answer #9 · answered by vehement_chemical 3 · 1 0

Almost as much as preparing one.

2007-03-02 15:59:52 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers