2007-03-02 07:32:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Dreadful piece of kit. Spent more time in workshops than on the road. The concept was brilliant but the engine was a disaster. The power pack was most unreliable and the batteries prone to leaking.
2007-03-02 07:44:11 · answer #1 · answered by Fraggle Rocker 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Given a 432 over a rover I'd go 432 anyday never had a problem, bit of a RPG Magnet but put up the goods....
2007-03-02 22:38:02 · answer #2 · answered by 284561 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If its the diesel version, then pretty good.
Its reliable if treated respectfully and if it is'nt then it is'nt. Simple as that. You can drive them on the roads as long as they have rubber tracks and you have the appropriate insurance. They're easy to maintain and normally come with a fairly comprehensive 'Idiots Guide'. Fuel comsumption is about 3 miles to the gallon.....as opposed to the 3 gallons to the mile for a Chieftan tank!!.
They normally come in two tone ...matt green and black!
2007-03-02 15:46:49 · answer #3 · answered by JohnH(UK) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's smaller and slower than the Striker used by the U.S. , but it's still like trying to drive a stretched limo when moving around Baghdad.
2007-03-02 16:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by gregory_dittman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a little big, I don't think it would fit in the parking garage, but I bet it would come in real handy moving those slow fools from the left lane. What kind of mileage does it get?
2007-03-02 15:39:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋