I know that this is his 2nd term as US president, but can he run for presidency again in the furure...after someone else has has become president? Do u think many would vote for him again?
2007-03-02 07:07:56 · 38 answers · asked by Sandra G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Sorry about my typos, folks
2007-03-02 07:08:51 · update #1
Once a person has been elected twice to the Presidency, they are no longer eligible to be elected again.
If a Vice President were to assume the office of the President with less than two years remaining in that term they would then be able to be elected to two-four year terms on their own.
No one can be President for more than 10 years in a lifetime.
2007-03-02 10:27:58 · answer #1 · answered by jpbofohio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. After Franklin Roosevelt's 4 terms, the Constitution was amended to limit any and every President to no more than two terms, total. Doesn't matter whether consecutive or discontinuous. Dubya can never be elected President ever again.
2007-03-02 08:25:44 · answer #2 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No his cruel and unusual self cannot have the presidency again at least not in the same body he inhabits...he can shape-shift he's reptilian they all are so look out. No I would not vote for anyone sending soldiers away from home so their wives and children can be murdered behind their backs. Twos the limit but heads up..they might decide to change the rules. So would you let them change the long standing rules? Hmmm
2007-03-03 16:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by Dane Aqua 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The correct answer is no, he can not. But apparently most of the aswerers don't realize that this is true because of the 22nd amendment to the Constitution which was ratified on February 27, 1951. Up until then, a person could be elected as many times as he or she wanted to run. (Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected to four consecutive terms. He died early in his fourth term. Ironically, it was a Republican Congress responding to Roosevelt's dominance that pushed this amendment, apparently not realizing that some day they might want one of their own to run for more than two terms.) That amendment states in part:
"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of President more than once."
For what it's worth, no, I wouldn't vote for him. And given his standing in the polls, it seems highly unlikely that he would win the nomination from his own party.
2007-03-02 07:26:57 · answer #4 · answered by ktd_73 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nope presidents are limited to two turns only. It guaruntees we remain a democracy. He can't even work in certain fields for a number of years after he ends his second term.
I am a republican, but I can't say that I would vote for him again. He has been weak on some issues, like border security, and I would like to see someone who is much more conservative at the helm.
2007-03-02 07:18:30 · answer #5 · answered by akivi73 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. A politician may be elected President of the USA for two consecutive terms only. Thats two terms each of four [4] years.
Something in the Constitution but not sure what.
The reason for this is stop the creation of dynasties in the US. Unlike UK which is stuck with a dynasty in charge, the House of Windsor - HM QE2, Chas, etc.
2007-03-02 23:49:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No he can never run as President again. The two term limit is it. Voting for him would be out of the question since he cannot run again.
2007-03-02 07:12:55 · answer #7 · answered by grandma 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, they're the two rather corrupt evil men. the only reason Obama gets much less flack from the voters of usa is as a results of the fact a million: he's extra likable, and a pair of: because of the fact he's of african background. Obama is an evil guy. while he replace into in Chicago, he superior a scheme the place he and his cohorts might permit Chicago residences disintegrate and degrade, then he might ask for Chicago tax funds and pay HIMSELF to demolish the crumbling homes- and rebuild new residences on real of the previous... rinse and repeat. of path no person talks approximately that. additionally, Obama works with Drug Cartels in Mexico even nevertheless he tries to enforce the conflict on drugs federal government regulations. collectively as Bush went to a conflict illegally under fake pretenses and has thoroughly destroyed Iraq it particularly is on the verge of a Civil conflict because of the Iraqi government oppressing the voters, Obama keeps the conflict in Afghanistan and plans on making use of TAX PAYER funds to deliver MERCENARIES to Afghanistan- therefor the government's presence continues to be there and we are nevertheless dropping BILLIONS of greenbacks killing rebels and harmless people who might do no injury to usa's harmless. Obama additionally makes use of drones to kill hundreds of harmless men, females, and babies- it particularly is against the regulation and is a sort of terrorism itself. Bush had Gitmo opened and tortured the illegally kidnapped alleged "terrorists", yet Obama reinstated protection tension tribunals, genuinely destroying his promise to the folk. He additionally keeps the torture by tension feeding human beings, and putting them in small rooms with loud steel music taking part in and strobe lights (psychological torture) Obama has additionally prosecuted the main whistleblowers interior the background of Presidents, and has an lively conflict on Press (see contemporary AP/DOJ Scandal) Obama is a administration freak. Obama is a corrupted guy. he's an evil guy. yet you are able to desire to obey. you are able to desire to be a sheep.
2016-12-18 04:16:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he cannot run again. According to the constitution, a president can only run twice.
2007-03-02 08:27:26 · answer #9 · answered by josh k 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, theoretically, declaring material law, He would be assassinated by his co-workers, this is common practice over there, quasi part of historical heritage from the good old times
2007-03-06 04:01:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋