Like flights 77 & 93 ???
2007-03-02 06:48:53 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't a Boeing 757. For one, if it indeed vaporized as all these sheeple are saying why was the only wreckage found only included a few paper light pieces and a turbofan from one of the engines that was too small to be one of a 757. Second, why are they only releasing 5frames of whatever hit the Pentagon. And from the one frame of the nose of the aircraft, it don't look nothing like that of a 757(this being from the countless books I've read when I was 10-16yrs old and having a father who worked for the airline industry for 20+yrs). How could a 757 pull off the maneuver that it said it did(270deg turn, dropping thousands of feet @ 500mph) with a pilot who could barely fly a Cessna? Today's' planes are made of aluminum and titanium(a very light very strong metal), and there is no physical explanation how it could've managed to squeeze itself into a tiny 16ft hole, while windows nearby were untouched? Also, if the plane vaporized how were they able to collect the DNA of the passengers?
For the plane that crashed in PA. 1. No cell phone could've worked at the altitudes and speeds indicated(most will argue that it was one of the planes own phones located behind the seats which they state it wasn't). Second why is the supposed call from the passenger to his mom, stated in him stating who he is to her? What, she didn't believe it was him or something? Second, any typical plane crash like the one mentioned would have a debris radius of 1mi or less, this one had a debris radius of 8mi!! Eyewitness accounts heard and saw another aircraft in the area at the same time of the crash. Very clear indication of it being shot down. The whole alleged recording of the passengers stating how they were going to take down the terrorists is completely bogus. Reason being there is no recording devices in any airliner cabin area except for the flight deck.
Let's not forget the other unanswered questions. Thus being how come none of the terrorists were on any passenger manifests, how come no one knows where they got their tickets? How come 7are still alive in the Middle East right now and have been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian(British paper)? Though to most who already answered, I'm just another one of those tinfoil wearing clowns you like to make fun of because you refuse to believe that our own govt. would do such a thing. Well, maybe you should do some research, and stop believing what they say in the Commission report. Enough of my explanations, take my advice and do your own research of plane crashes and plane materials and maneuverability of today's airliners. Research the fact that 7alleged terrorists are still alive and if they were involved how come they couldn't even land a Cessna. But I know you won't, you believe whatever the controlled media tells you(CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, FOX).
2007-03-02 08:01:10 · answer #1 · answered by Ted S 4 · 0⤊ 7⤋
What have you been smoking?
Those airliners did not "vaporize" -- there were lots of bits of debris around all three crash sites. But the mojority of the materials were consumed in the fires after the crashes. Aluminum, when it gets hot enough, burns quite readily.
2007-03-02 16:29:45 · answer #2 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You've listened to too many conspiracy theorists.
Search for the truth, not for misconceptions.
There were plenty of debris. However, much of the parts were burned up almost instantly, making it unrecognizable to the average joes like me and you.
Have faith in the elected officials. Otherwise, get out there in '08 and vote for the person you feel would make a difference. If not, kindly step off of your soapbox.
2007-03-02 14:58:21 · answer #3 · answered by casey_leftwich 5 · 7⤊ 2⤋
How does a car demolish itself upon a headon impact?
What happens to a grape falling from 500ft in the air when it hits the ground?
When an aircraft, full of fuel collides with a stationary object....such as the ground or a building...it explodes and demolishes on impact.
However, if you look at the WHOLE picture you can see PLENTY of leftover aircraft!
I'd suggest less caffeine and conspiracy thinking with a bit more KNOWLEDGE and LEARNING!
Thanks for the 2 points!
2007-03-02 14:54:22 · answer #4 · answered by KC V ™ 7 · 13⤊ 2⤋
Do you know how hot burning jet fuel is? You do know that planes are made of aluminum right? Do you know how low of a temperature aluminum melts? 660 degrees. A match will get up to 1700 degrees.
They didn't vaporize, they melted into little puddles. Don't even try to say they didn't hit the buildings. My brother watched the plane hit the Pentagon.
2007-03-02 15:02:23 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 7⤊ 3⤋
They set the Enterprise's main phaser bank on the highest setting and pushed the button.
You are a good example of the flaw in the survival of the fittest theory on evolution.
2007-03-02 15:14:54 · answer #6 · answered by Skubasam 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Just like I have told your other YA IDs, planes crashed into buildings. No conspiracy there.
2007-03-02 18:25:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Missed taking your meds again did you? Maybe you psychiatrist will make a house call.
2007-03-02 19:34:31 · answer #8 · answered by iraq51 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Check out a book on physics.
I was at a crash site for a jet that nose dived at a high rate of speed. For you conspiracy theorist for you hate Bush so much, give it up.
2007-03-02 15:12:48 · answer #9 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Read, the link, then hit yourself for believing BS
2007-03-02 18:07:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋