which is your pick..
2007-03-02 06:45:31 · 36 answers · asked by Kismet 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
and for some reason i can't spell quick today. that's what happens when you play on the net at work. eesh.
2007-03-02 08:10:57 · update #1
hmmm slow natural process or god diddit for everything.
2007-03-02 06:48:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolution
2007-03-02 07:01:48 · answer #2 · answered by jetthrustpy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution, but it doesn't matter. Science is not determined by popularity polls. Arguments and evidence are the real issue. There was a time when the overwhelming majority of laypeople believed that the Earth remains fixed and unmoving at all times, and regarded Galileo's doctrines as heretical and unBiblical. The fact that a view is popular or unpopular among laypeople with little to no scientific or biological expertise (myself included) is irrelevant to the scientific support for that view.
Besides, evolution does not preclude creation: theistic evolutionists believe in a God-guided evolution. Should we have a poll next to see how many people believe in gravity vs. creationism?
2007-03-02 06:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by Rob Diamond 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Evolution
2007-03-02 06:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Jason Bourne 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolution
2007-03-02 06:47:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolution!
2007-03-02 06:47:49 · answer #6 · answered by eastchic2001 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Creation
2007-03-02 07:05:49 · answer #7 · answered by jasmin2236 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creation. Both positions are based on faith, even though evolution believers claim that their belief is based on science. When is the last time anyone actually saw evolution? I guess that settles that.
Evolution states that every living creature on the planet is a result of natural forces, and yet, scientist are unable to create life. How can nature accomplish something by accident, that scientist in a laboratory are unable to duplicate? What kind of scientists are they? I believe the word is arrogant.
2007-03-02 07:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution.
Reality eliminates any possibility of a Biblical Creation, so now the Christians are left trying to find some way to salvage even the idea of a 'god' even if it isn't theirs.
The Creation Myths (there are two) in Genesis are jumbled nonsense. They have the Earth predating everything, plants existing before the sun and all other kinds of laughable errors.
No 'god' could have written the mess we know as the Bible.
2007-03-02 06:56:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it's not an either/or question, both could be true, I don't understand why people always think that creationism and evolution are two sides of the coin when they actually deal with different things, evolution explains the diversity of life that is found on this planet, creationism is a attempt to explain how life started/was created on earth
2007-03-02 06:48:23 · answer #10 · answered by Nick F 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Creation.
2007-03-02 06:56:31 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋