Isn't everything humans do natural (including manufacturing) since our behavior is governed by nature?

Question

Doesn't "unnatural" really mean "outside the laws of physics" or "paranormal"?

Everything is natural. The concept of "unnatural" has no meaning.

I Rock: Yes, killing is natural, but natural does not mean good or normal. There is no objective right and wrong. It's a human concept.

Answer 1

In a colloquial sense, "natural" typically means that something has come directly from the Earth with few or no processing steps. Of course, to a chemist or physicist, everything is natural, as you said.

Answer 2

The problem with your question is in its premise. You accept, without proof or sufficient evidence, that in fact we have clear understanding of cause and effect relationships in the brain.

So, to make the assumption that "behavior is governed by nature" assumes by definition a closed universe with no potential for external agency. Your question assumes your preferred answer its assumptions, which is a logic error.

We do not have a good understanding of cause and effect relationships in the brain. The brain is the most complicated object, by orders of magnitude, in the material universe.

It is very trendy to talk about behavior in tersm of "chemical imbalances" or trying to tie a neurotransmitter to a behaviour. The problem is that when you go from the subatomic, to the atomic, to the molecular, to the complex molecular, to the subcellular system to the cell, to the cellular system, to the organ, to the organ system, to the organism, to the organism functioning in a social context (behaviour). Each level of additional complexity has emergent properties that to varying degrees are/are not understood and are/are not predictable from the preceeding level.

The naturalist will point to the "law of emergent properties" as "evidence" against a creator, of course all along begging the question of "why is there such a thing as emergent properties?".

Therefore, you have committed a logical error in the form of your question, and you have also assumed greater knowledge about behavioural causes and effects than are known

Answer 3

There are stages of behaviour that are considered organic and stages of behaviour that earnings our social nature. if you're a assassin then you fairly do not earnings the social ingredient of people. similar in case you scouse borrow or dedicate particular sexual acts that are violent and anti social. Socially suitable behaviour varies from position to position. some small societies evaluate "borrowing" yet another persons issues very well and communal want dictates this. some extra city societies do no longer tolerate "borrowing", and phone it stealing. Sexual behaviour is dictated by your society, some fee virgins and in different societies devalue virgins. Morals are determined by the society you strengthen up in. The supernatural component of people is very a lot recognized by maximum societies.

Answer 4

Including killing?

Answer 5

If you start without a personal beginning then no. If we start from the impersonal then we have no meaning or purpose. We are just random acts of time+chance+matter. So if it exists, then it is right. But if you start with a personal beginning it goes differently

Answer 6

NO not everything is natural&are behavior is governed by the word of God

Answer 7

You are 100% correct.

There is nothing unnatural.

Answer 8

Yes. It is all natural.

Answer 9

that is only one meaning of the word.

Answer 10

Indeed.