It's now well established that George W. Bush never showed up for National Guard duty for a period of approximately one year, possibly more, in 1972-1973. Despite all the talk about "honor and dignity," President Bush has apparently flushed his down the toilet. President Bush went AWOL!! Cheney himself also received 5 deferments! Both of these men are “Chicken Hawks.”
2007-03-02 06:03:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You are absolutely right!
And take a look at all these Idiots who are defending them, claiming that Bush & Cheney are the best. I've seen prior post that Bush & Cheney are true Patriots, which is the furthest thing from the truth. Bush couldn't even handle National Guard Duty, he hid in a Cocaine oblivion. And Cheney did receive no less than 5 deferments to avoid fighting in Vietnam.
They both claimed we needed the insurgency in Iraq, when in fact history shows NO ONE has ever won an insurgengy. All insurgencies throughout history have ended with a political accomodation and a political settlement, or GENOCIDE! (thats the alternative)
Both of these men are not qualified to run this Country, they are both babbling, money-hungry idiots!
Susan-thanks for posting this question, maybe we opened a few eyes. I wish nothing but safety for your loved one in Iraq. God Bless you too! TY!
2007-03-02 12:17:07 · answer #1 · answered by Gianna M 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
actual they are, for the excuses you suggested. Even leaving the national shelter debate aside (nevertheless that's extremely sparkling that Bush did no longer fulfill his accountability there), Bush ought to've in simple terms volunteered for 'Nam, if he replaced into so professional-militia, as he retroactively claims. The Texas ANG replaced into approximately as possibly to get deployed to Nam as a results of fact the community 4-H club. as a techniques as a results of fact the "C=JD" guy's assertion that "That Bush critics have stirred up a hornet's nest over no longer something is pleasing once you think approximately they have been silent while Clinton dodged the draft. no person criticized Clinton for that one. " Um, confident they (Limbaugh and probable ninety% of alternative Repubs) did (criticize Clinton almost on a daily basis for the full ninety's) for "being a draft dodger", "how can he function Commander in chief", advert infinitum. undergo in strategies each and all of the REpug squawking related to the Black Hawk Down episode in Somalia and their claims that Bubba had no real to deliver troops into conflict as a results of fact he hadn't been there himself? in case you do no longer undergo in strategies that, you're the two too youthful or very truthfully absent-minded. So i hit upon it "pleasing" that the comparable Cons who held out try against service as an substantial qualification for the Presidency during the Clinton administration, immediately desperate it replaced into beside the point long approximately fall 2000.
2016-10-02 06:40:17 · answer #2 · answered by matusz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!
They are the strogest and best of the best. Without their strong leadership and decision making abilities, you might be wearing a towel on your silly head
2007-03-02 06:47:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
What is a chicken hawk?
2007-03-02 06:11:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell yes!
can a duck quack?
2007-03-02 06:07:05 · answer #5 · answered by me 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Now, can you move on?
2007-03-02 06:18:43 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, are you keeping count on how many times you are spamming YA with this question? You are in violation of the TOS.
2007-03-02 10:35:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Do you have any valid or intelligent questions to ask?
2007-03-02 06:25:24 · answer #8 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Do you use thing you call a head for anything other than separating your ears???? Dude...old OLD line get over it! Move on!
2007-03-02 06:08:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes, there is no denying it.
2007-03-02 06:06:54 · answer #10 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋