English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If politicians were forced to use VA hospitals when they need medical treatment, you think there will still be rote and rats in them? Would you support this legislation?

2007-03-02 05:45:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Thank you Pink, I think I love you. I'm not used to nice answers, but so far thank you all for all the BEST answers. Not Kidding You may see me on the news, Because I'm serious as hell about this one. I've heard for 30 years complaints and there should be 0 complaints when considering our veterans.

2007-03-02 06:10:16 · update #1

10 answers

ROFLMAO where do I vote on this issue? Who do I call?! That's the best idea I've seen in a long time. While we're at it, let's see if Barbara Bush spends any time in a Texas convalescent home if things would change then!! This was today's best question!

2007-03-02 05:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

To be honest, I don't think ANYONE should be forced to use VA hospitals. Or any specific hospital, for that matter. I think everyone should at least have a choice of 2-3 places to go. You do have a point, though. If politicians were forced to live in the conditions that their constituents did, a lot of problems would go away very quickly.

2007-03-02 05:49:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

If politicians were forced to use VA hospitals I doubt if the tax payers could afford to keep them open. The politicians would provide so many perks the cost would be astronomical. The rooms would be two bedroom suites so they would have a place for a guest or political intern.

2007-03-02 05:58:58 · answer #3 · answered by don n 6 · 2 0

The regulation is stupid and so are each and each of the solutions earlier mines. You all do comprehend that if the guy chosen to bypass in unprotected the girl chosen to allow him in no? If a lady is incapable of searching after a teenager herself with out toddler help she shsouldn't have the toddler and then rigidity the quite to pay for what isn't any her problem on my own. that is the position the duty isn't being taken. a guy can't be blamed for a being pregnant one hundred% you dunces. women people must have the right to make certain, yet then so might want to adult men. Why would a lady opt for to have a baby that she will be in a position to easily arise with the money for to preserve with toddler help besides? that isn't any thanks to reinforce a baby.

2016-11-27 00:24:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, if they are veterans. If they are not veterans, they should not have health care paid by us--they can buy their own or come up with a way so the average American can afford health care. And they should also have only Social Security pension benefits from the time they are in office.

2007-03-02 05:51:26 · answer #5 · answered by KCBA 5 · 2 0

I dont really care about which hospital i go to so long as i get the treatment i need. You dot go to the hospital for a regular check up, it's for emergencies only!

2007-03-02 05:54:07 · answer #6 · answered by kjbouche 2 · 1 0

They already do. The Presidents are required to undergo medical checkups at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
Additionally Senators and congressmen and other federal officials are treated there. You might wish to RESEARCH a question before you ask it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethesda_Naval_Medical_Center

2007-03-02 06:44:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

You know, that's a really good idea. I think I'll write my legislators and suggst it.

2007-03-02 17:21:26 · answer #8 · answered by Harry M 2 · 2 0

You bet your sweet azz

2007-03-02 05:50:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, but it would never happen-they always exempt themselves from their own, stupid, laws.

2007-03-02 05:53:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers