Is it better to be buried in a box to lay indefinitely or buried naturally, decay and be used as food?

Answer 1

I would rather be buried without a box and let the plants feed off of me. That's what's supposed to happen anyway.

Answer 2

If those are the choices, then buried naturally, decay and be used as food.

Answer 3

I want to be cremated, but if I were to be buried, I wanna go the natural route. I might as well do some good for nature after I'm gone.

Answer 4

The 'Box ' is no protection against decay,that comes eventually to all & to all organic matter underground.The coffin may delay the process a bit,but nothing more than that,it isn't made of indestructable material.

Answer 5

I pick the second object, as it is cheaper (bury in backyard) and is better for the enviroment. And also, you can be used as a natural resource in a few years.

Answer 6

Well, what do you think: burn her, or bury her?

Man: Um, well, um, which would you recommend?

Undertaker: Well they're both nasty. If we burn her, she gets stuffed in the flames, crackle, crackle, crackle, which is a bit of a shock if she's not quite dead. But quick. And then you get a box of ashes, which you can pretend are hers.

Man: (timidly) Oh.

Undertaker: Or, if you don't wanna fry her, you can bury her. And then she'll get eaten up by maggots and weevils, nibble, nibble, nibble, which isn't so hot if, as I said, she's not quite dead.

Answer 7

Box, I don't want to see bodies laying all around the place.

Answer 8

I'll chose a box, but you can just decay if you wish.

Answer 9

It doesn't matter. Worms and Flies will get to eat us up anyway, unless we are cooked in an oven until we become ashes.

Answer 10

It is better to be cremated, and used as fertilizer for champion-grown tomatoes.