All bodies evolve as groups in some manner, though as individuals they devolve. Souls take the form of groups, being inherently rational, so can't exist in a degenerate isolation except appearing so by infringement of the bodily characteristics.
Death remedies the isolations of souls, their material bodies, and all are benefited by intimate knowledge of the relationship to all others, and this is the experience of heaven and/or hell, to know who oneself has really been in their life. There is nothing but benefit from knowledge once it becomes used for remedying the previous problems, in this world, or the next...
2007-03-01 15:55:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gravitar or not... 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are, in reality, devolving and have been since Adam's fall. The evidence is in DNA and information theory.
God created the first people perfectly - healthy and strong; free from disease and corruption. They did not age - God provided nutrients that maintained these bodies.
Adam and Eve's disobedience brought corruption into the world and the world has been going downhill ever since. The second law of thermodynamics took over. Things began to go from order to disorder.
Adam was designed to live forever, but after being denied access to the tree of life, he only lived to be 930. Life spans began to shorten after the flood until it finally stabilized to where it is now.
DNA can be compared to software. It contains information - instructions on how to assemble us from raw materials. There is enough information in a single strand of DNA to fill a stack of encyclopedias stacked as tall as the Washington Monument. This was no accident. This is evidence of intelligent design.
Some (not all) scientists would have us believe that particles turned into people. DNA can not form outside of a cell, and a cell cannot form without DNA. The evolutionist has a chicken and egg problem. Which came first? A single cell is more complex than the Space shuttle. In fact, it is irreducibly complex; take away one component and it will not function.
This corrupt world is going to be judged then restored to the way God designed it in the beginning. He invites us to come along by turning away from the corruption and turning to Him.
2007-03-01 13:57:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by MythBuster 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.. things change constantly in no particular set way, life is adaptable, it is variable, and it is always moving forward in response to the constant and varied changes of life circumstances. No circumstance is exactly the same as it was before and so evolution can not proceed backwards towards an earlier form.. it can still move forward to a form that is similar to a more primitive form but it would not be devolving. Its not linear, with a start and beginning its circular with no starting point and no goal if you get what I mean.. Its just a constant procession of varied changes in living creatures over a long period of time in response to the constant and varied changes in lifes circumstances over long periods of time. There is no backwards or forwards its all just steady progression within the circle of life.
2007-03-01 13:55:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The concept of evolution, as is commonly understood, is still a theory, one that was repudiated by it's creator on his death bed. It's funny this little piece of information is overlooked by those who support evolution, yet the truth is that Darwin did indeed renounce the theory of evolution before he died.
Mathematically, the theory of evolution is an impossibility; and logically, the possibility that everything came from chance is ridiculous. It's not rocket science to realize that order could never come from chaos. Not one verifiable record exists to substantiate evolution.
While evolution may be wrong, things do devolve. In fact, in all recorded history, the only genetic changes to have occurred have been adverse, never beneficial.
2007-03-01 13:54:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No.
There is no such thing as "devolving" except in science fiction. Species are in a constant state of (very) gradual according to environmental factors, sexual selection, and natural selection. Any changes that might happen to a given species are merely part of the process.
Evolution does not have an end goal or a line of progression. It is simply the process of change through natural selection. Nothing more.
2007-03-01 13:41:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scott M 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
no but you can resolve and revolve, but devolve is out, it took too many years to get where we are, no going back now.
I am still waiting to get the eyes in the back of my head, and the extra arm, I need them.
so resolve to revolve but don't devolve, you need to evolve, does that solve the evolve,devolve question? or should I resolve to dissolve the devolve and evolve dilemma?
2007-03-01 13:40:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. Even if we began changing over successive generations to look like our closest ancestor, the chimpanzee (including the feces-flinging, which is just fun), we would still differ at the genetic level and have the luggage of our previous contemporary selves attached to these genes.
2007-03-01 13:34:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by abulafia24 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
if evoulution were true we would devolve, get the balance nothing changes. our cells are no complicated 100 trllion with millions of parts (all found only in our specie) we dont change we pick up our looks from grandparents th genetic area has nothing to do with cells which are like a quadrillion but the genetic area tells how many fingers and eyes to have- we have the same gene as the fly in holding our neck up but we dont look like flies- creator made flies that way. evolution being fact is like a ant talking evolution is hoax go to way of the master.com
2007-03-01 13:37:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by philosopherx 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Nope. We could grow more fur, or our brain size could decrease (perhaps to reduce glucose consumption) in response to the environment.
But that would still be evolution.
Development of species is not a straight line.
2007-03-01 13:32:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Contemplative Monkey 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Such a statement INCORRECTLY suggests there is a direction to evolution.
Evolution is simply the adaptation to changes in environment such that the adaptation is better suited to the new environment. It is undirected and its success or failure is not guaranteed.
2007-03-01 13:37:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
4⤊
0⤋