English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1 - Binary star systems defy the possibility of accidental star formation! How did they get there, without crashing into one another?—p. 27.

2 - Multiple star systems could not produce themselves, yet are in the majority.—p. 27.

3 - Differential binaries are too close to have occurred by a chance accident, yet most binaries are differential.—pp. 27-28.

4 - There are no binaries in star clusters, yet nearly all stars outside of clusters are binaries. Evolutionists cannot explain this. —p. 28.

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/Cre-Ev-Enc-TOC.htm

2007-03-01 12:02:28 · 11 answers · asked by tim 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

OK, Paul S, where is your proof? Since people who say they don't believe in God also say they think logically and demand evidence of everything why not produce proof of your unbelief?

Never mind I'll post it as a question.

2007-03-01 12:11:46 · answer #1 · answered by drivn2excelchery 4 · 1 2

Dear sad fool

Mathematics was invented in India, they invented the symbol '0' which enabled calculations to be done easily.

They did this in about 800 ad, and their symbols were given to us by the Arabs, hence we call them Arabic numerals.

The church declared them the work of the devil, and plunged Europe into a dark age until 1500 by burning anybody who used them as a sorcerer or witch.

Without the crude superstitions of religious fools like you, we would have understood cosmology 800 years earlier.

Do you now accept maths to be the work of God? what hypocrisy

You have read two books now, the bible and the subjective rubbish you quote as gospel... come back when you have read a few hundred more books, not just page 27 and 28 of this rubbish, for until then, talking science, you do nothing but steal air....

2007-03-01 20:11:14 · answer #2 · answered by DAVID C 6 · 0 1

1. Gravity

2. Why could they not?

3. Who decides what 'chance' is acceptable and what's not?

4. Stellar development is not biology, so why would evolutionists care?

------------------

I visited your page and noticed the following error right at the beginning...

"THE ORIGIN OF MATTER 54 scientific facts disproving the Big Bang evolutionary theory about the origin of matter and the stars "

Big Bang and evolution have nothing to do with each other.

Next time quote a credible source.

2007-03-01 20:08:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You have obviously never seen a gravity model. Here is one from Cornell: http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/astro101/java/binary/binary.htm

They get there about the same way that planet form. And only about 5-10% are binary, where the hell do you get most?

2007-03-01 20:09:45 · answer #4 · answered by Alex 6 · 1 0

Plus look at the simple fact. We all believe in math and we know the entire universe works on the principles of math. But how can a random explosion of the big bang create such a perfect item such as math? for the numbers always add up. Nothing random can create something as great as math.

2007-03-01 20:11:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

On #4, are you sure you don't mean "cosmologist"? Biology doesn't have much to do with stars forming.

Don't drink the bong water, dude. Let me know when what Stephen Hawking says about your uhh hypothesis.

2007-03-01 20:07:04 · answer #6 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 4 1

Oh, so just because we apparently can't find the answer then it MUST be God? I will not accept that God did ANYTHING until it is proven.
And disproving one idea does not automatically prove another.

2007-03-01 21:28:10 · answer #7 · answered by God Fears Me 3 · 1 1

Maybe if you didn't post a biased source I would bother to give you a real answer.

2007-03-01 20:08:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

And I suppose you came to this conclusion by actually studying astronomy instead of reading some creationist's book.

Right.............
.

2007-03-01 20:07:45 · answer #9 · answered by Weird Darryl 6 · 0 1

LMFAO.

How about this? Here's 4 reasons why there could never be a God:

1 - There isn't any god.

2 - There can't be a god.

3 - God couldn't exist.

4 - There are no gods who exist.

Sounds pretty silly, doesn't it?

2007-03-01 20:05:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers