Sorry, no they won't... different car. The Contour parts will fit on the Mercury Mystique, but the Mercury Sable equivalent was the Ford Taurus, of which its parts would fit.
Contour/Mystique 4 cyl = 2.0L, 6 cyl = 2.5L Duratech
Taurus/Sable 6 cyl = 3.0L, or Duratech 3.0L 4V
No common engines
2007-03-01 12:26:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by joe d 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
It depends on the engines in both vehicles. You'll need to match up two Duratec engines.
While all later model Sables had a 3.0, there were different ones. The regular 3.0 is pretty much unlabled. The other is the Duratec-this is the one you'll need. The Duratec will have an engine cover saying 24valve Duratec, it will also say 24valve on a badge on the fender.
The Coutour will need to be a 2.5 V6 Duratec. This is even easier to tell as the other option is a 2.0 I4 Zetec (same as in the Focus).
Many Duratec parts are interchangable, but you'll need to check out specifics on the parts.
If the Sable is not a Duratec you'll need another Sable or a Taurus. The 3.0 non-Duratec was used for quite awhile in both, so it should not be hard to find one for the parts you need.
Hope this helps.
2007-03-02 01:22:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Showtunes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depends on the size of the motors on each vehicle. 100% of all sables are normally 3.0 liters. Some contours are 4 and 6 cylinder. If the contour is a 3.0, then the parts are interchangeable. If the contour is a 4 cylinder, then no the parts are not interchangeable.
2007-03-01 16:42:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
To "Q & a guy": Your argument isn't very valid. whilst a woman has conceived a newborn, the toddler, of course, isn't at present completely grown. It starts off off as a fetus without all the actual structures which you may see in a human. additionally, even whilst the youngster is born, it maintains to advance. the youngster even finally ends up with greater bones than it as quickly as had; particular applications of an toddler's ideas get weaker as they grow previous too because of fact they finally end up being out of date. As we advance, our cells consistently multiply inflicting us to get greater desirable in length, so the theory that all of us began from a single celled organism isn't too a ways fetched. to no longer point out, quite a few microorganisms that reason ailment evolve as our drugs gets greater better. it extremely is all with reference to the organism adapting so as that it extremely is in basic terms before the sport and insure the continuation of the species. EDIT: yet another ingredient that I forgot to show is that our "layout" isn't even perfect. we are liable to mutations and ailments. additionally some aspects of the physique are not extremely needed; there are some issues that our bodies can not of course recover from besides. Now to the question: the only part of the 'God theory' that seems sensible is the "enable there be mild" ingredient. in line with danger this grow to be probably the huge bang. in line with danger this universe grow to be created by danger by some clever beings or some organic happening phenomenon. possibly it will ensue back. the assumption of an all-powerful being has in basic terms developed with mankind over the years to describe what could no longer be defined. Even now as quickly as we gained't clarify something we associate it with issues that we are already familiar with.
2016-11-26 23:05:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by remeika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ford contour and the mistique are the same car
2007-03-01 12:42:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by mish 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
some of them will ,their pretty much the same car,good luck.
2007-03-01 11:41:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by dodge man 7
·
0⤊
2⤋