Tactics used to cover up 9/11 conspiracy?

Question

The majority of people know that there was a conspiracy, but many will try to keep the truth away from you.



The following tactics are used to quiet anyone who attempts to expose any of your subversive acts about 9/11:
(when the 9/11 conspiracy is mentioned)
1. First, you ignore the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.
2. If the information starts reaching too many people, you ridicule the information and the person giving the information. (For example: joke about being part of the conspiray, resort to name-calling.)
3. If that doesn't work, your next step is character assassination. If the author or speaker hasn't been involved in sufficient scandal, you are adept at fabricating a scandal against the person or persons.
4. If none of these are effective, you are known to resort to physical attacks.

http://911scholars.org/
Scholars know

Answer 1

This is going to sound bad and I don't mean it to be, but I seriously heard that the Jewish were behind it and that like a lot of them did not go to work that day...But who knows...everything in this world is turned into a conspiracy...Did Neil Armstrong really walk on the moon?

Answer 2

History of 9/11 requires scrutiny once the filter of angry fearful grief emotions no longer distort logic so that the events can be looked at objectively. Architects and Engineers for 911 truth are experts in their respective fields, there are also pilots for truth and firefighters for 911 truth who question the inconsistencies as they relate to their profession.
False Flag operations are quite common and documented! Research them. The difference with this one is that 50 years have not passed so the players involved are still alive and can be tried for treason.

Answer 3

Bravo, bravo, worthy of a standing ovation;check out this website:

http://www.davidicke.com/content/category/6/19/32/

According to the people on this board it was a coincidence that all of the CNN workers who belonged in the WTC, just happened to not show up that day?

And all the FBI agent's children who should've been in the building of the Oklahoma bombing, just happened to not be there that day?

Oh and let me guess the BBC reporting about the WTC collapse 20 minutes before it actually did is just a coincidence as well, right?

Yeah, right; you're kidding yourselves. It's because of people like that that the National State ID Act is coming in 2008

Answer 4

Seriously, get a grip on reality. We don't need to hear about 9-11 conspiracy theories. Especially considering this is the religion and spirituality section, not the mental health board.

Answer 5

I wonder what tactics were used to cover up the Y2K conspiracy.... Oh wait, it turned out the conspiracy theorists didn't know what they were talking about and it never happened. Maybe that should be tactic 5, remind the conspiracy theorist in question about their all time biggest failure!

Answer 6

You forgot the most important tactic:
5) Publishing the actual SCIENTIFIC FINDINGS of the various engineers who looked into the event and found NO EVIDENCE of any sort of 'conspiracy'.

Answer 7

Sure there was a huge up tick in murders trying to quiet the ten thousand or so that it would have taken to pull that off. Loosen up the tin foil on your head, it is cutting off the blood flow.

Answer 8

From the research I have done, I don't think it was a conspiracy.

Answer 9

1. This belongs on something other than the R&S board.
2. You are full of it.
.

Answer 10

Tactics to create 9/11 conspiracy
The majority of people know that there wasn't a gov conspiracy, but many will try to sell more conspiracy media and literature.

The following tactics are used to make mountain out of a mole:

1. Taking short phrases, sentences out of context. Completely changing its meaning.

BBC article titled " Hijack 'suspects' alive and well " is really about case of mistaken identity due to stolen/misplaced ID. Because criminals do steal IDs. Surprise! But 911 theorists just take the title and do not even read what the article is about.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
There is reason the title put quotation mark around 'suspects' in Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.

Rumsfeld gave a quick talk in which he says,
"...people who did the bombing in Spain or people who attacked the US and NY and shot down a plane over Pennsylvania, attacked Pentagon..." (Donald Rumsfeld)
He talks about terrorists who attacked Spain and the US but accidently says terrorists shot down flight 93. And this is widely used to claim the US shot down flight 93.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7171005197553914151&q=rumsfeld+flight+93+shot+down&hl=en

Most famously, Larry Silverstein who told he made decision to 'pull' people out of WTC7.

So here is guy, who is not a demolition expert but people claim he used demolition insider's jargon to admitting to blowing up his own building on nationally broadcast TV interview. Not so 'inside job' it is eh?

Numerous people used the term 'pull' on that day to describe evacuation of recuers. I suppose everyone was running around telling secret 'inside job' every where on 911.

2. Internet is filled with 9/11 conspiracy websites, videos, blogs, C-Span which is seen by millions showed 911 'inside job' convention meeting (they ran reruns of it), Alex Jones have radio show, sell 911 'inside job' videos, documentaries

Google, Yahoo, government and others who are accused of hiding facts work together to bring you services that help to spread 9/11 conspiracy theories.

But they all claim free speech is dying. Is it just me or these guys nuts?

Try googling China, human rights, civil liberties.

Conspiracy proponents accuse normal people of being ignorant, blind to facts, 'even sixth graders knows physics!', 'you don't understand fact, laws of physics', 'not open minded'...etc

3. Let's see. 9/11 conspiracy people do post stuff like so and so is 'lying scum bag' (refering to popular sci authors) and more graphic stuff to describe who dispute 9/11 'inside job.'

Who is 'you'?

So every facts you agree to is fact, but other information that dispute your position is labeled 'fabrication' and 'attack.'

4. So who got beat up? I've only seen people play around on internet. I would personally sign a petition for a hate crime if someone got beat up for talking about 911 conspiracy and if petition is started.

Link to news articles or blogs if someone was seriously hurt for talking about 911 conspiracy.

Or is that another phony claim?