LOL Well, I'm sure you've figured out the answer by now. No it does not contain Bull Semen. But should you be faced with another stupid statement, or another Urban Legend such as this, check it out at www.snopes.com. They have the truth behind the legends.
2007-03-01 09:48:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by traveler 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
notwithstanding it is also no longer unavoidably in simple terms 'practise' v 'genetics'. practise is in simple terms no longer the right time period, too narrow. 'administration' would likely be extra appropriate. for instance as a lot as ninety% of canines which kill or heavily injure actually everyone looks unaltered men. that is neither 'practise' strictly speaking nor 'genetics'. Likewise the CDC discovered that 2/3's of canines in severe bite incidents were chained up outdoors. it really is glaring that many or lots of a few thing are canines illegally operating loose. a majority of those issues in part make canines extra aggressive immediately (unaltered canines are, canines operating loose extraordinarily in packs tend to be, chaining up a canines can make it extra territorial than in the different case) yet also markers of a particular type of proprietor frame of mind and behaviour likely to reason issues. Outright 'practise' themes like homemade probability-free practices practise, are also likely to pass with it, and also likely to reason human aggression incidents. this manner of proprietor is likewise linked with decrease back backyard breeding. yet, i locate truly some the reliable statements about 'inbred volatile pits' besides because those 'it really is in simple terms practise' to be poor in any definitely medical info. absolutely that for all the talk about it, this subject has no longer been studied in a sturdy medical way. Such reliable statements are frequently in accordance to distinctive human beings's own impressions, regularly received from incomplete or incorrect media expenses, it really is worthless. or perhaps to the quantity the impressions are received from first hand journey, i have dealt with truly some 'pit bulls' and have not encountered many if any with undesirable temperaments in the route of human beings, yet I do not forget that would variety with the position and circumstances. the in effortless words element that in simple terms about actually everyone with genuine credentials in veterinary technology is of the same opinion is that there is not any info that probability of human aggression or 'unpredictability' can reliably be ascribed to a canines in accordance to what it appears like. Such attribution by visual charm is the essence of Breed particular law, and it really is nonsensical. once actually everyone is of the same opinion BSL isn't the answer to at least some thing, then there is a great number of room to communicate precisely what all the contributing aspects, and their weightings, are interior the vicious canines problem.
2016-12-05 02:53:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It also contains blood from dead babies, because you can only get that lovely flavor from the bat's eyes if you marinate them in a mix of semen and baby blood.
No,Red Bull does not contain semen. It contains water, sugar (or sweetener if it's sugar free) , vitamin B, and lots of caffeine. I hope you didn't buy your friend's lie.
2007-03-01 14:49:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by jimbell 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i also heard this but its not true. if you visit the site below it will explain all. lol http://energydrinks.factexpert.com/906-energy-drink-taurine.php
it basicly says:
In RedBull and other energy drinks, however, the taurine is a synthetic element. There is no truth to the myth that taurine is an extract from a bull’s testicles, although this rumor has been circulating for years.
but theres allot more info there if you wanna know more. :)
hope ive helped.
2007-03-01 09:28:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by moggle 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
yummmm...wownow I'm gonna start drinking it...
no, silly it does not...your friend is just kiddin you...or really dumb
2007-03-01 08:38:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT THE FDA WOULD LET THEM SELL THAT ON THE MARKET. WOUL YOU DRINK IT IF IT HAD THAT IN IT?? I WOULDN'T GROSS.
2007-03-01 08:43:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by tiger207 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
know that's an asinine statment...your friend is a tard
2007-03-01 09:07:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sire_D 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
your friend is an idiot, and you are too if you believe that.
2007-03-01 08:38:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by thearc2007 1
·
0⤊
0⤋