......as it clearly states all reasons, goals and objectives for the U.S. lead invasion of Iraq, a large part of which are goals that have now been met. This was signed by most of your now lying, leftist leaders who were at the time in total agreeance with the WORLD community's intelligence and stance on the imminent dangers of Iraq's foreign policy.
Read:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html
Let the same old, tired, usual hypocrasy, doublespeak and lies now commence !!!
2007-03-01 07:55:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yeah. - I didn't think so, either. But the one little fella's attempt at John-Kerrying his way out of it, was a valiant and noble attempt...."Just because we voted for the ability to use military force, doesn't mean that we had to use military force...."
Do you know how ridiculous you sound ? It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.
2007-03-01 11:13:28 · update #1
look at teh fools on here..
You get things from them like the world didnt agree.. oh yes it did. And there is evidence of it.
And you get things like the lies started with Bush. he was using intelligence information. The SAME intelligence information the intilligence committe ( that is half demo ) saw and based their decision on.
Is it ignorance or purposeful self deceit that prevents you from seeing the truth.
2007-03-01 08:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
maximum people who hardship with the difficulty in any respect might admit that the English language is in a foul way, in spite of the undeniable fact that it extremely is in many circumstances assumed that we can not by extensive conscious action do something approximately it. Our civilization is decadent and our language -- so the argument runs -- ought to inevitably share interior the final fall down. It follows that any conflict against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like who prefer candles to electric mild or hansom cabs to aeroplanes. below this lies the 0.5-extensive conscious perception that language is a organic enhance and not an tool which we shape for our own applications.
2016-11-26 22:37:48 · answer #2 · answered by pirozzi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These people will not change their mind for anything, they will say you made up that link yourself even though it is whitehouse.gov.
They forget that this wasnt all on bush, at the time everyone was with the fact that saddaam was bad and that this terror problem had to be handled now. The difference is the left switches opinions based on how the public feels on any aprticular day instead of sticking to their guns and beliefs like the conservatives. We do the right thing even when others believe it may hurt someones feelings, because it is for the good of the nation and for the good of freedom and democracy.
2007-03-01 08:02:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Did ya ever stop to think that maybe some of those liberals that voted on using force voted with information they were given by this administation
the lies began with Bush
2007-03-01 08:12:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did you read it? It says...
(a) strictly enforce through the United Nations Security Council all relevant Security Council resolutions applicable to Iraq and encourages him in those efforts; and
(b) obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions.
-- Bush ignored the UN and went in anyway w/out UN buy-in
Look, everybody in congress was mislead into thinking Iraq was a threat and had WMD's. They weren't and they didn't.
2007-03-01 08:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This is old. And the world community DIDN'T agree with the intelligence. That is why so many countries, like France and Germany, were against the war. They had different intelligence, but we didn't listen to them. So, we got Britain and...Poland who agreed with us.
Many did support the war based on this document. But it turned out that the document wasn't the most honest thing ever. I do blame them for not investigating the matter further.
2007-03-01 08:02:49 · answer #6 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Wow! What is this The RED NECK's ARE RUNNING RAMPANT TONIGHT, We know what this means, This Means your losing the Argument as well as the War, and now your fiddling as Rome burns.
The 2000 US election was rigged to get your man in, the information about Iraqi WMD was rigged so you could send the troops in, and now it's all falling apart your looking to Blame others for your FAILURE.
Pathetic that is what you are PATHETIC.
2007-03-01 08:46:50 · answer #7 · answered by itspinkynperky 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There was one little "where as" omitted in that resolution. "where as" George W. Bush lied his a-s-s off, and spun the intelligence about the actual threat Iraq posses to the world, this request is submitted because Sadam tried to kill my daddy.
2007-03-01 08:15:26 · answer #8 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lefties don't remember what they voted for or why, they just check the dailey polls and do it.
2007-03-01 08:06:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
come on man! due you think any liberal will admit they are wrong? they will just blame you, me, the GOP and any host of others to stop their faults from becoming public.
2007-03-01 08:01:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋