The U.S. was wrong in dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima.?

Question

Do you support this claim?? Why or Why not?

Answer 1

On the pure morality of that event, obviously it was wrong. That is the moral answer. Politically and to a certain extent logistically it made sense to utilize a weapon that was so devastating. Let us not forget that the end of World War II was the beginning of the Cold War. There are two rights to this question. We could of course starved the Japanese island by blockade, but that would have led to even more deaths given the state of mainland Japan, plausibly leading to even more deaths than the two atomic bombs. Then we would be asking if the blockade was right or wrong. To all the users of the derogatory term "jap", grow up and get "learned" because you do a disservice to the rest of us. To the would be historians answering this question, I recommend John Keegan's World War II, it gives you the total resources aspect on why things went the way they went during WWII.

Answer 2

It's true we lost the moral high ground after use of the nukes on Japan, but looking at what Truman faced in 1945, i probably would've done the same thing. To compare the moral depravity of state sponsored genocide where the death ovens at Aushwitz/Birkenau were topping out at 2,600 per day or 80,000 killed per month and the aerial bombardment of civilians is looking at different scales.

The "Final Solution" was the policy of only one country during the last century, and it wasn't the U.S. My beef is with the multi-national business cartels that allowed it to happen, the top being IG Farben (now BASF, Bayer, among others).

Not only did they finance Adolf, they supplied him with Zyclon B for use in the death camps. The American side of the company was not tried at Nuremburg, although they were just as culpable, go figure.
The fire bombing of Dresden by the 8th Air Force and RAF Bomber Command, caused the destruction of 15 square kms including 14,000 homes, 72 schools, 22 hospitals, 18 churches, etc. with a conservative estimate of around 30,000 civilians killed. At the time, the Germans used it as propaganda to advocate against following the Geneva conventions and to attack people's perception of the Allies claim to absolute moral superiority. The military claimed the railroad center was a military target, which it was, altho it was up and running a week later. Feb 1945 was only 3 months away from May 1945 (end of the Euopean war), the outcome of the war was not in doubt, so why bomb a 'cultural' medieval city of 600,000?

The firebombing of Dresden and nuclear destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes, genocide should also include civilian victims of aerial bombardment. Even after saying this, i still don't think the Allies were close to the moral depravity of the Nazis and their wholesale holocaust of the Euopean Jews.

The bombing of civilians is a great tragedy, none can deny. It is not so much this or the other means of making war that is immoral or inhumane. What is immoral is war itself.

Answer 3

No I do not. The war would have gone on 6-12 more months conventionally, and the decision to bomb Hiroshima was sound. The fact that Japan STILL did not surrender proves the fact. We then had to bomb Nagasaki, THEN they surrendered!!
Make no mistake, this is not a racial thing either...My wife is Japanese, I am German!

Answer 4

With hindsight, the answer is the U.S. was wrong. There can always be another solution, especially given today's technology.

However, back in the day, I'm sure conventional wisdom told everyone (except the Japanese) that it was the thing to do.

I don't think it was a horrible decision by the people of the time, but I do believe that times have changed.

Answer 5

It was wrong in the sense that many innocents died, and it is a horrible thing to do, but we were at war. This event brought about a quick victory to the war, which everyone wants. The Japanese expected the US to either enslave or kill off the remaining population, but I think we treated them pretty well, don't you? Now Japan is a US ally, and in the 80's they were crushing us in the electronics market.

Answer 6

nicely relies upon what you desire to teach, in an essay like this they're going to desire to be certain an enterprise attitude and can desire somebody who has a distinctive outlook or attitude on something that grow to be seen a very undesirable pass then what many of the classic thinkers might say, (AKA majority of the international), killing human beings regardless of the place they're from and who they're is ethically "incorrect" on any grounds, while you're writing an essay i think of you may get greater useful effects going against the "popular majority", Its sounds like a topic rely that makes for solid debate, reason on why its write or why it had its objective and why it extremely is seen as incorrect ect, ect... For eg: Its undemanding to portray us of a of america because of fact the undesirable adult men for dropping a nuke on the city yet did you or have you ever seen the word "for each action there is an equivalent and opposite reaction?", Ever evaluate the justifications or activities that led as much as the dropping of the nuke?, One wish jap Air-Commander as quickly as reported (whilst he gained be conscious that Pearl Harbor grow to be effectively BOMBED), "I worry all we ought to have carried out is awaken a snoozing huge", if that they had seen the end result and anger that must be generated in us of a of america from bombing of Pearl Habour, might the assumption of using such great weapons on a u . s . a . that grow to be jeopardizing anothers freedom and each thing it stood for, have even being seen?, maximum defiantly it would if that they had the nuclear weapons at that factor yet they didnt, (And im gona stop there), Its an intresting subjecty and one i think of you may tackel in favour of who ever, yet dont in basic terms bypass with the popular public of opinion, consistently be brave adequate to formulate ur own.

Answer 7

Nope. I saw a documentary once about how the US got some of the materials they used by intercepting it from Axis shipments to Japan.

Answer 8

no, im sorry to whoever might be offended by this, but the Japanese were extremely underhanded at Pearl Harbor and picked on the wrong country. the whole world knew the US was a superpower and when you play with fire....

Answer 9

No we were not, you do what you have to do to win a war, plus if I remember correctly they bombed Pearl Harbor first...maybe we should do the same thing in the sandlot called the middle east, sure would be easier and they would learn their lesson to not mess with us.

Answer 10

Let's just say the world is unfolding as it should...right or wrong.

Fun to flex your muscles though isn't it.

I wonder why no one has used it since?

Oh and by the way, free trade has ensured that Hiroshima's organically grown clementines are shipped exclusively to the USA. :~)