English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There was a guy who wanted to work on the roof of his A frame home. So, he secured himself on one side by tying himself to the family car and began work on the other side. His wife, not knowing, got in the car and took off and seriously injured the man.

Information will govern your actions.

So, what have you secured your faith to? Evolution, your IRA, your"self", or ...God's promises?

You are only as secure as that which you have secured yourself.

2007-03-01 04:30:39 · 3 answers · asked by ScottyJae 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

JP... am I gonna have to give you the 10 points for being the only one who ansered or is someone else typing something even longer as we speak?

Should I just make that my next question?

2007-03-01 04:45:21 · update #1

elmjunbur (?)- actually I mentioned self. That is what you are proclaiming. That you have secured yourself to yourself. I've jumped out of helicopters, and never would I have thought to secure myself to myself. Someday I will "jump" out into eternity and I think that the principle will still apply. I have secured myself to something much stronger than I.

2007-03-01 04:50:57 · update #2

Lucky Fokker- Agreed.

JP- you know I had to bust your chops. Thanks for responding, but you know I'm gonna have to read that a couple of times before I get what it is that you're saying. I'm just one of those stupid christians, ya' know?:)

2007-03-01 04:56:47 · update #3

3 answers

Information is half the equation, having wisdom to use it properly is the other

2007-03-01 04:47:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I do not operate on the basis of faith or belief. Logic and knowledge are far superior tools.

There are three things I hold as valid, but I do not consider them 'true'. In fact, because they are axiomic, that means they cannot be proven. They are simply the rules of the game, as it were:

1. Mathematics and logic are valid. Truth is an inherantly logical proposition. Without logic, the truth-value of any fact could never be known, there would be no way to distinguish between a true fact and a false fact. Without logic, knowledge would be unattainable.

2. Observations, unaided and aided, are valid. However, aided observations must be supported by prior observations and mathematics. For example, before the theory of optics was discovered, a microscope would have been invalid; but through study of unaided observations of lenses and beams of light, the theory of optics was mathematically formulated, so the microscope is valid. A crystal gazing ball is still invalid, but if a way to define the effect mathematically and in a way that could be verified with unaided observations was found, it would become valid as well. Without being able to trust our observations, we could aquire no data on which to operate, and thus knowledge would be unattainable.

3. The supernatural, if it exists (note: no statement is made of its existence or non-existence, just a conditional), does not in any way interact with the natural world. If a supernatural involvement can be had, then nothing can be assured as true. If the deity that oversees gravity decides to change the universal gravitational constant, for example, all things we know will suddenly be invalid, and thus knowledge could not be attained.

It is important to recognize that none of these things is considered true; they are axioms. An axiom is a statement that must be accepted or not accepted on its own merits. However, as each of them can be shown to be necessary for knowledge, one must either accept these three things, or, one must accept that nothing at all can be known, let alone known to be true or false. So these axioms must be 'accepted' or 'held' to attain knowledge, even though their axiomic nature means they themselves cannot be proven.

-------------

Hey, you asked what we secure ourselves on. You'd expect me to have secured myself on something so simple it could be summed up in a catch phrase? You should know me better than that. ;)

-------------

Christianity and faith don't make you stupid. Closed-minded Christianity and closed-minded faith do.

You don't have that closed-minded problem. You're pretty intelligent I've found, because you're pretty open-minded.

And yeah, I always figure that long winded answer is gonna get my chops busted up good. *g*

2007-03-01 12:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of the above. I have confidence in my ability, knowledge, and intelligence. I don't need any of the things you suggest.

2007-03-01 12:45:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers