English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-28 19:38:47 · 11 answers · asked by irfaanvirji 1 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

What's the Final Solution to the Iranian nuclear question? hmmmm, hopefully not the same answer as to the Final Solution to the Jewish question.

2007-03-01 12:40:42 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

They will not back-down and one of the reasons spoken by
President Ahmadinejad himself" The people of Iran and Islam love death and the western world love life. The Iranian's think when they get to the other side of life, that Allah will praise them. He also said this past Sunday that his country Nuclear program was like a train without any brakes or a reverse gear. Iran has repeatedly refuses to halt enrichment as a precondition to negotiations about its program. There will be one more battle to fight and it is the battle between evil and good according to the word of God. And Iran will lose it!
Jordan, Egypt & others have ask Iran to stop.

2007-02-28 20:02:10 · answer #2 · answered by NJ 6 · 0 0

Iran has the right to pursue a nuclear energy program like any other state who has signed the NPT. This treaty not only encourages the building of nuclear power plants but it also obliges to help other signatory states building them.
You don't trust the Iranian government that they will use it just for producing energy?! Well, may be they don't trust your government that you are sincerly interested in the complete nuclear disarmament of all nuclear weapon states (which is also a point of the NPT).

2007-02-28 23:15:46 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas S 2 · 0 1

Iran is a country tightly controlled by the mullah's or whoever it is. they think by getting a nuclear bomb under the guise of nuclear power will insulate them from the American military shocks and provide them with ample protection from their life long enemy "the Zionists". already they have a weapon called "oil". and when that is exhausted they think can substitute nuke in place of oil..they also think by getting America bogged down in Iraq they can somehow blackmail America in agreeing to their demands."on the whole i think it is just a ploy to get what you want".
ALREADY THE NORTH KOREA HAS SHOWN THE WAY. WHEN THIS IS THE CASE WHO IS SURPRISED IF SIMILAR THINGS HAPPEN IN IRAN'S CASE ALSO.

2007-02-28 20:11:52 · answer #4 · answered by yogi123 3 · 0 0

And what question would that be exactly?

Without an explanation, I say bomb the **** out of their nuclear sites and then send in the Marines from the west in Iraq to make sure we got everything.

The only problem with this is that Iran has a 6 million man suicide bomber army, that is convinced that when they die they are going to heaven.

2007-02-28 19:53:16 · answer #5 · answered by JohnDoe 3 · 0 1

it extremely is been an prolonged time on account that pacifists and left wingers have been in potential in Iran. Iran could have a bomb interior 4 years. i'm hoping we wil have a president with the balls to tell them that if a nuke is going off, everywhere, by all and varied, that it extremely is going to be presumed to be Iranian and the completed u . s . a . would be immolated.

2016-11-26 21:37:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think its an interesting problem. they should be able to use nuclear energy to generate power. I worry about a culture that produces suicide missions having nuclear weapons, but if they can gather the necessary resources to produce one, I don't see how you can stop them more than temporarily. I think I'd start assembling a crack team of scientists to make them obsolete. All the best ones, Morgan Freeman, Jeff Goldblum, Steve Martin, etc. No nambypambies.

2007-02-28 20:00:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It is extremely dangerous for Iran to have the capability to produce nuclear weapons. Something has to be done.

2007-02-28 19:46:05 · answer #8 · answered by AintSkeered 3 · 1 1

Another world war

2007-02-28 19:46:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

my opinion, non of the world should have nukes. only then everyone will feel save and not start a war.

2007-02-28 20:01:39 · answer #10 · answered by anderson 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers