what an idiotic question.
the Romans were into crucifiction.
2007-02-28 18:07:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by For_Gondor! 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
~~*Passes out laughing*~~
This is brilliant.
I'd have to say no. To many, it is only important to offer up worship and sacrifice when it is convenient. Then again, if a jeweler could make a tiny version of the four horses and their entrails in 24 carat gold you'd see them on necklaces, bracelets, pins and altars everywhere. The churches would have the parts of poor Jesus in the four corners of the room. Wow, imagine what would happen if he'd been put on a stretching machine. Jesus Gumby!
2007-03-01 05:04:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me, Thrice-Baked 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it'd be as graphic as you imagine it. True, the cross is a Christian symbol, but we never see an ENTIRELY accurate depiction of Jesus on it. Any Jesus we see on a cross COULD be horribly mangled with all his innards oozing out of that spear wound in his side while blood pours out of his head, but that would just be in grotesque taste. What would be the point in that?
If we have to see a bleeding and battered Christ, I'm glad it's just a few trickles of blood here and there. :S
2007-02-28 18:07:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
looks to me like you could find better questions to ask besides demeaning others belief and you might think this is funny but in the end you won't. I have children that could ask better questions than this . until you walk in jesus' shoes refrain from making rude remarks
2007-02-28 18:20:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by gingerbell 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Jesus party crackers for easter, one pulls the feet, the other pulls the hand, and Bang, explosion, and out of the middle come the treats! KEWL!!!
2007-02-28 18:08:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by U-98 6
·
1⤊
1⤋