English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

Ahh, no doubt you are reacting to the Cameron press conference. Christ was not married, therefore there are no members of his bloodline.

Keep in mind that Cameron is pandering to the public and his "find" will be proven to be just bad science:

- The statistical analysis is not rigorous

- The name "Jesus" was a popular name at that time, appearing in 98 other tombs and on 21 other ossuaries

- There is no historical evidence that Jesus was ever married or had a child

- The earliest followers of Jesus never called him, "Jesus, son of Joseph"

- It's unlikely Joseph, who had died earlier in Galilee, would have been buried in Jerusalem

- The Talipot tomb and ossuaries probably would have belonged to a rich family, which is not a historical match for Jesus

- Fourth-century church historian Eusebius makes quite clear the body of James, brother of Jesus, was buried alone near the temple mount.

- The two Mary ossuaries do not mention anyone from Migdal, but just Mary, a common name

- By all ancient accounts, the tomb of Jesus was empty, making it unlikely that any body was moved, allowed to decay for a year, then be put into an ossuary.

- If Jesus had remained in the tomb, first-century opponents of Christianity would most certainly have found His body and put it on public display.

- Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the conclusions cannot be supported by the evidence – but it's a way to make money on television. He would have nothing to do with supporting the movie's assertions. "It's nonsense," he said.

- James, the half-brother of Jesus and author of the book of James, the early leader of the church in Jerusalem, was martyred for his faith. Why does James make no mention in his letter that Jesus was not bodily resurrected? When he was about to die why didn't he just recant his beliefs and say, 'Okay, okay! My brother didn't rise from the dead. Here's where we took him. Here's where his bones are. Here's our family tomb. We made the whole thing up?' People will generally not die for a lie when they know it's a lie. Why would James die perpetuating a lie when it would have been so easy to disprove? In fact why would any of the apostles go to their deaths for something they knew to be false?

As I have expected, there has been **no scientific or historical find** that has ever been shown to disprove the authenticity of the bible's history or theology.

Kind of sad to see that all it takes is a press conference for folks to form opinions versus taking the time to rationally examine all the issues and dig a little deeper. We are living in the Macdonald's generation: fast, superficial, and never satisfying.

2007-02-28 17:33:00 · answer #1 · answered by Ask Mr. Religion 6 · 0 0

I don't know.

I heard a rumour that George Bush was a member of some secret society at some point in his life.

Rumour has it....that the bloodline of Jesus may also be connected to a secret society.

It's difficult to tell what is fact and what is fiction.

Anything is possible.

2007-02-28 17:54:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

That proves that Jesus isn't the son of God yet a prophet(messenger) of God . We Muslims have self assurance that Jesus became into no longer crucified yet raised up alive and could return to earth as real messiah .

2016-10-02 03:42:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Jesus Christ never married and never had children. Therefore there is no "bloodline" that began from Him.

Please do yourself a favor....read the bible, not the nonsense of these attention-seeking people.

2007-02-28 19:15:10 · answer #4 · answered by Esther 7 · 0 0

truly if Jesus had a wife, or wives! than he had children who begat other children.

Most people can show geneaology that goes back to Abraham. for he is the father of many nations.
but if jesus had one daughter named TAMARA, or other sons and daughters, than that means there are others as well who can prove to be descendants of jesus

however declaring to be the son of Jesus does not mean anything if a person is a servant of sin. such people will be rejected
if the catholic church claims to have the ONLY true line of authority they by themselves can prove to become the false anti christ. but their claim is through Peter not Jesus.
the antichrist is given power by satan not by geneaology

2007-02-28 17:34:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES! All those who have received Jesus as their Lord and Savior and who do the will of His Father are in the Family of God.

2007-02-28 17:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by Apostle Jeff 6 · 0 0

Ryan K, there might be now.
If anything they may become the true Christ. Mortal man.

2007-02-28 17:31:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

According to the holy book..anti-christ are the atheist!

2007-02-28 17:25:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't believe so. There is no record of Jesus having a child.

2007-02-28 17:25:45 · answer #9 · answered by Radictis 3 · 1 1

No, becauee Jesus was not a real living person, just a composite in a fictional story.
Antonius

2007-02-28 17:24:53 · answer #10 · answered by antonius 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers