How far are we justified in occupying the planet?How far are we justified in our behaviour towards animals?

Question

This planet is not meant exclusively for humanbeings.This planet is meant for existence of all living beings.But we are eliminating all these various living beings in one form or the other and showing our dictatorship over them.The dogs does'nt know that it has to go to Municiple corporation to obtain a license for its survival as the same is not written in its language.same is the case with monkeys,pigs,rats etc.all these are named as stray just as they do not have license.They have no place in this world to live peacefully .All the roads are meant for vehicles and passers by.there is no road laid for animals like dogs cattle,goats etc.If an animal is seen sitting cooly in one corner persons throw stones on it .why?our scientists inject various harmful drugs into these animals like monkeys pigs,rats etc just to find out how the drug works and how it can save humanbeings.we load heavy loads of iron on these bullockcarts just because we can get our works by subjecting animals to cruelty

Answer 1

The animals eat us too? Does that mean they should leave?

Answer 2

You're a total fool.

Your definition of "living peacefully" is impossible. It's total nonsense. It's a contradictory phrase.

You think it is even biologically POSSIBLE for any living thing to live without disturbing the "peace" of another?

Even a blade of grass does not subsist on sunlight and water alone. They convert nutrients found in soil to grow and produce more grass which will also convert nutrients to grow. Those nutrients are there because something died and decomposed.

Deer eat grass, and grass is alive. Wolves eat deer. The deer fight back.

And this all seems so pristine to you, but look at the insect kingdom. Some insects produce poisons, and make it impossible for other life forms to exist around them, let alone eat them. Some ocean life does as well.

And yeah, we build stuff that looks ugly, usually to benefit our own safety and comfort. Ever seen a beaver dam? They're ugly, but the beavers like them. They damage rivers, but the beavers like them. It's a safe place for them to live. Should they live in trees?

But you're right, the planet isn't exclusively for human beings. We actually need those other animals. They are food to us, just as we'd be food to them if they had the chance.

Answer 3

provide up with each and all of the baloney. you're performing as though human beings arent animals!!! we are animals first. in case you think of selection is something nicely worth protecting you are the 1st animal in the international with that concept. while this planet became into Pangea (each and all of the continents linked an prolonged long term in the past) there have been in basic terms an particularly few species in the international. became into that some morally undesirable ingredient!! It became into like that for tens of millions of years. Do you sense its merciless that there are a number of ants that catch and enslave different ants?? there is not any organic and organic foundation for the arguements which you're making. in case you think of we choose roads for the animals discover some people who think of such as you and set up a recreation guard someplace.

Answer 4

Life on earth is interdependent and it is not meant for man alone. Man's destructive ways seek to eliminate other living beings. But, he does that only at the peril for his own survival.

Answer 5

As long as one is not able to clean his portico or the living room HIMSELF, you are talking about the Planet and the Galaxy - go and sleep, yar.

Answer 6

Have you gone to Mumbai slums and seen the life of millions?. Dogs have better life.

Answer 7

Havent you seen planet of the apes? They will have their revenge.

APE KILL APE!

Answer 8

we belong here, it is the only home we got.

Answer 9

Should we leave?