...not on purpose, of course, just you know, "Hey, I've solved the energy crisis, but sorry, there's no such thing as God..."
2007-02-28 13:05:21 · 19 answers · asked by Desiree J 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No one has ever proven there _is_ a "god", so there's nothing to disprove. Your "question" is either disingenuous or you don't understand the basis of proving things.
.
2007-02-28 13:19:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Desiree, we have no math that lets us construct a physics which can tell us that. Even superstring and m-brane theories do not and can not tell us why there is an existence at all, only that there is and how it behaves.
We'll figure out how it all took place back to one quadrillionth of a second from the start. But before that? I think not. This is why, though an atheist, I say there is no verfiable evidence of an intelligent creator and the concept is thus far irrelevant. I do not claim there cannot be an intelligent creator of some sort, but it does seem reasonably slim that it resembles the anthropomorphic and catastrophically flawed beings humans have thus far concocted and called gods.
2007-02-28 21:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering every thing we have disproved about the buy-bull i.e. the world being flat… everything in the universe revolving around the earth etc.
Religious people will continue to believe regardless of what science has done or will do.
Einstein showed us in E=MC2 that mater and energy or interchangeable but yet religion still clings to the creation saying mater could not have come from nothing.
2007-02-28 21:16:59 · answer #3 · answered by Melanie T 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Didn't know the purpose of science was to disprove god. I thought it's purpose is to figure the world out. Study things. What do I think will disprove though. Hmmmm. Don't think you will ever shake the faith of the true die hards.
2007-02-28 21:14:53 · answer #4 · answered by fifimsp1 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. The logical reason is because to disprove the existence of God one would have to know the whole universe to conclude that God is not in it.
The scientific reason is that science can only tell us how things work and only if they can imperically test them. It takes evidence and explains the evidence. If one does not find evidence one cannot apply scientific methods in order to draw conclusions.
2007-02-28 21:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by Tim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh there is a God alright he created you, and there will never be a human being now or in the future that will ever disprove the existence of God, and neither will science.
2007-02-28 21:15:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Science has nothing to say on the existence or otherwise of gods. Gods are, by definition, supernatural. Science deals with the natural not the supernatural. Science is not into proof either, it leaves that to mathematicians and logicians. Theory is as good as it gets in science.
2007-02-28 21:10:48 · answer #7 · answered by tentofield 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science doesn't prove or disprove infinite things, it only verifies the activity of testable systems. It will never happen. The people who believe in God are everybit as justified as those who don't. Nobody knows what's out there.
2007-02-28 21:15:01 · answer #8 · answered by Zeek 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing in science can disprove God. What it does disprove is feeble religious doctrines. The proof of the disproof is how much hatred the "devout" have for science.
2007-02-28 21:28:40 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if Science proved that God existed, one would find ways to disprove Science.
Even if many signs and other phenomena appeared, one would find ways not to believe.
2007-02-28 21:14:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋