Please explain how and use evidence to back it up.
2007-02-28 12:08:48 · 13 answers · asked by gruz 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unintelligent design by an unintelligent creator.
2007-02-28 12:14:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
God created Adam & Eve ... maybe Adam & Eve were 1-celled creatures living in a puddle (called Eden). Then they evolved. God created man in His image, but nobody's ever seen God, so we don't know what we should look like.
Who's to say that those features are vestigial? Maybe God just wanted everyone to have a little tail?
2007-02-28 20:21:49 · answer #2 · answered by Den B7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just the same, you can not prove God did not create the world so that we evolve and thus get vistigial features.....you try to explain your side and back it up with evidence. You can't because Creationist can always claim God intended it that way, science just proves the way God created.
2007-02-28 20:16:20 · answer #3 · answered by Greenwood 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
God created man in His image yet I don't think God would deceive mankind with vestigial features because they are useless and signs that we have evolved. since we have them, it would make one wonder if he really is there at all?
2007-02-28 20:17:05 · answer #4 · answered by kevinhoegle 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
How does that disprove anything...so what we have useless organs...who is to say that we ever used these useless organs...thats a preety lame way to try to didprove religion...if your purpose is to blow the minds of us christians then you will need to do better then that. There is zero reasons why we should even concider explaining it because it doesn't do anything to disprope anything
2007-02-28 20:18:26 · answer #5 · answered by Spades Of Columbia 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Without purpose nothing has reality. I believe in God, and evolution, so the creatures may enjoy progress.
2007-02-28 20:21:25 · answer #6 · answered by Gravitar or not... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They'll just deny that they really are either useless or what they appear to be, i.e. the legs in whales aren't legs.
Just watch.
2007-02-28 20:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by Lynus 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They will just say that God had some spare parts so he tacked them on some animals =P
2007-02-28 20:15:06 · answer #8 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yeah, ontogeny really does repeat phylogeny, how can that not be obvious proof against creationism?
can't wait to see how creationists try to explain that away!
2007-02-28 20:13:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Here you go.
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/embryology_02.html
Get A Grip.
2007-02-28 20:15:41 · answer #10 · answered by Get A Grip 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋