he spends 30 grand U$ to heat and electrify his mansion? gee, imagine what he spent on heat and electric before the movie, if he cut back?
what a maroon. moral issue, my arss.
2007-02-28 06:14:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
putz davy: make sense much?
2007-02-28 08:03:17 · update #1
larry loner: i spell exactly they way intended. your small mind cannot understand? not surprised.
err, what's up doc? what a maroon!
2007-02-28 08:06:17 · update #2
hey david, al gore has placed himself as the leader of this so called issue which invites comment. and what should we think- its okay for him to preach as long as he isnt held to the same standard. grow up and realize when your being had.
2007-02-28 06:26:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well let him believe the lie. The problem with CO2 is not there the plants have taken care of most of it ,and the CO2 accelerates the plants growth so that what the plants couldn't handle before the will grow to where they can now. Mother nature has all kinds of variables that help keep it all in balance.
2007-02-28 15:46:17 · answer #2 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In my rural state you are the poster boy for what is known as... "the pot calling the kettle black"... or stated another way... if a moron spells moron as maroon is he a colored moron or just plain stupid?
You didn't address any moral issues unless, of course you meant your ***.. which you spell as arss. Even a Brit would have spelled it ****. Read more if you know how, if not hang out at the library someone may take pity on you. I sure pity you.
2007-02-28 14:23:46 · answer #3 · answered by Larry L 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As with many of the left-wing activist celebrities, they follow the idea of "Do as I say, not as I do".
In other words, us common folk must drastically change our everyday lifestyles to avoid a slight inconvenience to their luxurious lifestyles. After all, it wouldn't be fair to Al Gore or Barbra Streisand to inhabit a smaller residence. Otherwise, how would they be able to physically demonstrate their superior wealth to us peasants?
And then they wonder why Democrats can't get elected, even after numerous Republican disasters....
2007-02-28 14:23:12 · answer #4 · answered by wheresdean 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore is not particularly my hero, but I would not bash him over an exaggerated utility bill. The man lives in the high rent district in an area that the utilities are sky high. He has worked for his position and has the right to enjoy it as he does. You are obviously biased in this question and have no sense of right or wrong concerning the topic due to your bias.
2007-03-06 19:22:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
what if his house is super effecient and he takes the sun into consideration in his design of his house unlike alot of other buildings and you think just because it looks like a big place its like super effecient and maybee his transportation is the same way really effecient if i was that high up there i would have the best technology that money could afford and i would designate like a huge tract of land to conservation and leave it that way forever if i could
2007-03-06 23:04:07 · answer #6 · answered by peter w 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you ought to get the whole story. To start-that $30 thousand figure is a false figure given out by a neocon group who lied and said they got the figure from the Power company.
The real figure is half that--according to the published power company bills--and they never talked to this group.
And of course, like most of the neocon groups, they conveniently left out the fact that Gore is converting his home to solar energy.
Oops! The neocons got caught lying again. They never learn! :)
2007-02-28 14:32:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
So his behavior makes his comments invalid? Of course not. Try thinking on your own and not listening to people like your parents.
2007-02-28 14:22:06 · answer #8 · answered by Peretz David 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋