Did Noah and his wife and 3 sons and 3 daughters have shampoo? Also, did they shampoo the animals that had hair?
2007-02-28 03:19:40 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
oops, a sign of the joke to come, i mispelled serious
2007-02-28 03:20:07 · update #1
Oh, that's not fair. EVERYBODY misspells heere!!!
2007-02-28 03:42:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No shampoo, and since they were on the ark for 375 days and the number of animals on the ark, between feeding and mucking stalls of all the animals, they would have had no time to sleep or eat either. So shampoo would have been the last thing on their minds.
Oops, and Gazoo is out by three days. When you read the Bible it states they are on the ark for 1 years plus ten days (365+10).
2007-02-28 03:26:40 · answer #2 · answered by cor001000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your technological awareness "data" factor fairly misses the topics with the Flood tale. a million. No geological data of a international flood, and yet we are able to tutor the position floods have got here about "domestically". 2. no longer adequate water to flood the earth, neither is there adequate hydrogen present day on earth to make the water. both one in each of those might want to correctly be verified with ordinary math. 3. Genetic does no longer help the declare of 8 human beings or for both of unclean animals, 7 of unpolluted. 4. a sturdy timber boat of that length does no longer have had the structural means to very last in "open sea". 7. They were on the ark for everywhere from 1/2 a year to a year, the nutrition to feed each of the creatures might want to have taken a huge quantity of area, now to not indicate that they could have necessary extra stay inventory for the beef eaters. There are similar problems with feeding the animals at the same time as loading and stale loading. 8. The water stress from the flood, as well because the shortcoming of sunshine might want to have killed all plant existence and maximum, if no longer all, seeds.
2016-10-17 09:30:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well for that slight chance that you might really be serious... They had all sorts of fragranced soaps and potions back then as the sise men of old describe to us... and contrary to peoples beliefs or lack thereof Noah and other great men as him were smart educated well versed in matters of the world and not 'evolved monkeys'. We have to stop thinking that we are the 's***' and are smarter then people were back then. Look at the Egyptians..... Astrology, Geometry, Philosophy, Etc...
2007-02-28 03:46:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, I hope so.
Jimmy, what about all the poor children who live without shampoo now?!?!? I think we need to start a global campaign to bring shampoo to all the children in the world who live without!
2007-02-28 03:32:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shampoo wasn't available then. I'm sure they had soap. You know there was plenty of water!
2007-02-28 03:23:41 · answer #6 · answered by robee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i was disappointed that this was not a seriious question or even a serious question. but id say no prolly not.
2007-02-28 03:24:30 · answer #7 · answered by its not gay if... 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seriiously, Mayor Jim, I thought you really wanted to know something.
2007-02-28 03:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by thankyou "iana" 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I hope they did. It probably would have smelled pretty bad without it after 372 days.
2007-02-28 03:24:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mayor, mayor... no shampoo back then, closest thing they had was their version of soap...
2007-02-28 03:24:01 · answer #10 · answered by dadknows 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELLO!!!
It is quite obvious they used Head and Shoulders.
No one was complaining of dry scalp were they?
2007-02-28 03:25:32 · answer #11 · answered by Solafide55 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋