Has anyone besides Mav noticed that Muslims believe Y!A is anti-Islam, Christians believe Y!A is anti-Christian, Athiests believe Y!A is pro-Christian?
Perhaps Y!A is pro-conflict??
2007-02-28 02:03:02 · 11 answers · asked by Mav here! 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yeah, I've noticed that. I don't know about all of YA, but the R&S catagory really seems to be pro-conflict. I don't know if it'll ever change, but I have noticed it.
2007-02-28 09:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by Tonya in TX - Duck 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hi Mav! No, you're not the only person that's noticed that. Personally, I don't believe Y!A HAS a religious persuasion, or a real political persuasion.
I agree with you, Y!A is simply pro-conflict.
2007-02-28 02:14:35 · answer #2 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its more like Yahoo! Answers is anti-conflict, and will delete anything remotely offensive to anyone.
2007-02-28 02:07:07 · answer #3 · answered by Michael 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its religion. Thats what religion always causes. There's a reason why its said to never talk about religion or politics. Because those two are the things that are sure to cause a fight.
2007-02-28 02:09:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pangel believes that many people dont try to change things with informing people in a constructive way...
they just moan about it lol
2007-02-28 02:11:32 · answer #5 · answered by Peace 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they are biased and opinionated like the rest of us dude
2007-02-28 02:06:19 · answer #6 · answered by Tribble Macher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is b/c all those people cant just get along
everyone should respect others beliefs but it is to easy to trash others
2007-02-28 02:08:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
conflict does make for better attendance!
2007-02-28 02:07:09 · answer #8 · answered by ALEIII 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
very. bias is often fun to watch if you are on the outside, or just less opinionated.
2007-02-28 02:17:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Y!A is pro-Christian.
If anything, it is pro-status quo.
2007-02-28 02:06:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋