Whats all this about finding the Tomb of Jesus?

Question

Saw a little bit of it on TV. It said thay might have found the tomb of Jesus? Can this be true? How would they know?

Answer 1

The finding of the so-called bones of Jesus Christ and his family is just another crude attempt to discredit Christianity. To prove that the bones are those of Jesus you need a tissue or blood sample of the Biblical Jesus. Since there is nothing to compare it with, everything will just be conjecture and theory. No one will benefit from it except those who are behind this story. It is a business venture that will make millions just like the Da Vinci code.

Amos Kloner, the Israeli archaeologist who wrote the original excavation report called the claim "nonsense." Kloner noted that Jesus was from Galilee and had no ties in Jerusalem. He added that the names found in the burial site were common during the time of Jesus. He also said the tomb belonged to a middle or upper-middle-class family during the the first century and that the cave had been vandalised. Commenting on the documentary Kloner said, "It is a beautiful story without any proof whatsoever."
Peace and every blessing!

Answer 2

there's a tomb in Jerusalem it really is speculated to be Jesus' tomb. there is a few reliable, yet no longer compelling, info to tutor that it will be. The tomb contained burial packing containers (I ignore the time period) for a Joseph, Jesus, Mary and some others. the usual info is interior the incidence of names i.e. at the same time as lots of the names are truly common, the combination of names jointly interior the tomb, in all fairness uncommon. James' field became said to be discovered there notwithstanding, there is reliable reason to view this one as a forgery, plus the testing of absorbed hint aspects became no longer a reliable tournament - IMHO. Edit: This tomb is a lot extra likely to be the definitely tomb than the only interior the Chapel. lots of the "Holy" web content that individuals visit at present were "discovered" in the course of the crusades. it really is fantastically unclear that any of them are genuine.

Answer 3

It's nothing more than a publicity stunt. The only way of proving that the man in the tomb is Jesus Christ is to match the DNA to someone who is a direct descendant. Since we do not know of any direct descendant, the case is closed. I'm an atheist by the way.

Answer 4

Jesus was resurrected from a borrowed tomb. Jesus ascended into heaven - no bones left behind.

Even if you don't believe in the resurrection, knowing that the man was placed in borrowed tomb rules this out, as the tomb found was a *family* tomb.

Answer 5

the tomb was found in the 80's and there is no way for them to prove who is there. they make their whole claim on names on the burial boxes; names that were very common during the time the tomb was built.

Answer 6

As everyone knows, the actual location of Jesus' tomb was in Al Capone's vault.....

Jesus and Mary were extremely common names in 1st century Palestine. Finding a coffins inscribed with these names means nothing. Except to encourage debate.

In actuality, there is an abundance of evidence that a historical Jesus never actually existed.

Answer 7

Sure might be true if they searched hard enough. But Jesus rised from the dead. And ascended into heaven.

Answer 8

They claim that they may have found the tomb and they claim to have found bones in it. But notice i used the word claim both times.
It's a rouse to get Christians doubting their faith.

Answer 9

No. Just another attempt by a hollywood lib to try to discredit Christianity and make money off the gullible atheists.

Answer 10

Hollywood Hype.
The producer gets paid to make the story sensational, make money, etc.
No proof whatsoever.
Doesn't phase my beliefs one iota.