"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
2007-02-28 01:28:56 · 7 answers · asked by Mail J 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
He also said "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program" 17 February 1998; speech at the Pentagon
NOW THE DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED, THAT THERE NEVER WERE ANY WMD'S AND HE TOOK US TO WAR FOR HIS OIL BUDDIES??? Right!!!
2007-03-01 08:27:47 · answer #1 · answered by Ro! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Clinton
2007-02-28 09:32:31 · answer #2 · answered by Ajax 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And guess what, there were no WMDs. Bush is a complete idiot. He, supposedly, went after WMDs and found none. He should have stayed in the Texa Air Guard where he couldn't do any damage. Well maybe he might have accidently blew up El Paso, but that would be better then he's doing now. Oh wait a minute, that's right, he couldn't cut it in the Air Guard. My bad.
2007-03-04 12:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by c321arty 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably Bill Clinton
2007-02-28 09:31:46 · answer #4 · answered by Louis G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HughMorris: Who should we send to fight wars? Senior citizens?
2007-02-28 10:07:47 · answer #5 · answered by Curt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
give George bush kudos for maintaing 'peace' in iraq. the man has done alot and deserves awards from osama bin laden. please help me informe the old man in the white house to get osama 'DEAD OR ALIVE' to award him.
2007-02-28 09:42:16 · answer #6 · answered by Yese Michael 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i believe it was either bill or hilary clinton.
2007-02-28 09:39:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋