Recently, there's been a debate on which format is better. Personally, I think the HD-DVD is better because it's like a DVD but better so it doesn't require much changes during manufacturing. I know Blu-Ray discs can store more data but sometimes, maybe size doesn't really matter?
What do you think?
2007-02-28 01:26:38 · 2 answers · asked by Halo 07 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Other - Electronics
This is VHS and Beta all over again. Personally I plan to wait (possibly a long time) and see. DVD is sufficient for now and produces good picture quality up to 50" (the size of my TV at home - btw, the Panasonic Plasmas really rock!). As has been seen many times before, the best format doesn't always win. Beta was technically superior to VHS ... I never bought a Beta nor did most people & VHS won. LS-120 drives were superior to Zip in many aspects and yet they fizzled. So did the 2.88MB floppy.
I plan to sit on the side lines until the winner is clear and then buy in only after the prices have come down.
Bert
2007-02-28 01:40:50 · answer #1 · answered by bertd.geo 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Nine Inch Nails has proven blu ray is better, thus releasing a further clue on the blu ray BYIT.
The decision has been made!
2007-02-28 09:34:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋