and the son 'judah' that apparently was jesus's son and his wife marry magdolin who everyone thought was a wh_ore???? If it is all true how will you look at your own religion. will you just deny the facts and stand by your faith?? Will you start to question all that you have been taught? I do not tie myself with a religion. I do believe in God so this is not an athiest asking this question.
2007-02-27 22:48:19 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
For the people that answreed...thanks for 'answering' the questions. I am not saying that it is completely true. I just want to know what you would do if if was completley true. Obviously you would just deny from your responses. Try to leave paranoia and superstitious beliefs out of your answer.
2007-02-27 22:59:54 · update #1
One girl on a different question already said that these rumors about Jesus' family (and what-not) "are in fact not true". That's a quote. Wow! She knows for a FACT that they are not true. She obviously possesses some incredible proof/knowledge that they rest of the world is ignorant of. It's pretty amazing.
And Christians only rely on archaelogist when they can show something in the Bible is actually true. Any other time archaelogists show something, Christians deny the science as accurate. It's quite ridiculous!
Disclaimer: I'm not saying that this evidence does in fact point to jesus' remains or those of his family.
2007-02-27 22:53:58 · answer #1 · answered by eastchic2001 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
From what I have read and seen the evidence only points to James Cameron and his friends needing to make another bunch of money. All the archealogical evidence says that the tomb and crypts are not from that time period. It is people who want to shoot down Christianity who are going to make James rich again and I am sure he will thank you for all the money you spend on it.
2007-02-28 07:07:30 · answer #2 · answered by martha d 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a complete load of garbage- how many professional archaeologists are taking it remotely seriously? None that I'm aware of. I'm not an archaeologist but I am a historian and the appearance of evidence like this complete with names just doesn't happen.
2007-02-28 07:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were many people back then that named their son Jesus. I believe with all my heart that He is alive, and this is Satan's attempt to destroy the belief in Jesus. Mary Mag. had demons sent out of her. The people that stand for truth will not be fooled.
2007-02-28 06:58:52 · answer #4 · answered by salvation 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
These are not facts.This was found 30-40 years ago,it would have been front page news.It is a money making hoax
2007-02-28 06:53:42 · answer #5 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can't even figure out who the father of Anna's baby is, yet they are certain that this two thousand year old tomb contains the remains of Jesus and His family? Come on!
2007-02-28 06:59:30 · answer #6 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They were planted by the teams of scientists that planted dinosaur bones and other geological false evidence trying to persuade us that the Earth is more than 6000 years old.
2007-02-28 07:05:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The evidence is falsified. It doesn't make a difference to Christianity.
2007-02-28 07:36:32 · answer #8 · answered by Buzz s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It all comes down to what we believe in.
In those days, many people had those names. now, many people still have those names.
til proven, this news will only anger christians/catholics.
2007-02-28 07:15:30 · answer #9 · answered by x.rain.x 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those names were very common.
2007-02-28 06:52:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋