To defend illegal immigrants, and at the same time attack people for misspelling and some gramatical mistakes (as an argument, but its not relevant to hypocrisy issue).
2007-02-27 18:45:51 · 7 answers · asked by type2negative 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Memnoch: The irony is, if you didnt get it, That immigrants usually are not fluent in English.
2007-02-27 18:59:15 · update #1
Pamela: The funny thing is its you who is defending people, that cannot comprise a sentence in English (I mean Illegals who speak only spanish). So. .. Hmmmm How Hypocritical is that.?.
Plus, About answers to your questions - You only listen to people that agree with you. Whoever disagrees - you are quick to look for punctuation errors. So, sorry I can undrstand them. If you cant - Thats more like comprehension/mental development issue.
2007-02-27 19:09:41 · update #2
Pamela (2) And i didnt direct question on you. I Asked separate. If you didnt get - the question was to assess extent of hypocrisy of a very common situation(Personal attacks to be exact). The fact that you recognized yourself - Well its your problem. May be you are the one to be reported?.
2007-02-27 19:11:36 · update #3
Pamela (3) it is an immigration question. You didnt get it, but I will point. Its about illegal immigrants, and hypocrisy. We dont have a section for hypocrisy.
2007-02-27 19:13:00 · update #4
1, there is no hypocrisy here. Fluency in an unofficial national language is not a valid prerequisite for "legal" immigrant status. Fluency and grammar ARE prerequisites for compelling arguments.
2007-02-27 19:51:25 · answer #1 · answered by Michael E 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I guess you're referring to me here. I have yet to see an intelligent and well thought out answer to any of my questions. The people you are defending don't care to answer my questions only to call me names. I suppose that is more admirable than me pointing out grammatical errors so severe that I can't even understand what they are trying to say? I'm not following your logic or understanding why you've made it your personal mission to defend people who can't even compose a simple sentence.
Gee, thanks....I'm a 10!
By the way, isn't in violation of guidelines to direct a question toward another? But see....I'm a better person than to report you for something as silly as that. Have fun with this at my expense. Then again, exactly HOW is this an immigration question? Oh, you just wanted me to SEE it so you posted here even though it's irrelevant to immigration. I get it. Scale of 1 to 10 question....sounds like a "Polls & Surveys" question to me.
2007-02-28 03:02:26 · answer #2 · answered by Pamela 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I guess if you wanted to stretch it you could go for a 3, but only because you are complaining about people being unaccepted, but not accepting someone who misspells something.
2007-02-28 02:54:25 · answer #3 · answered by Memnoch 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
on a scale of 1 to 10, i'd have to say "0".
2007-02-28 03:23:34 · answer #4 · answered by dottygoatbeagle 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
10. However, correct spelling and grammatical fluency would unarguably help strengthen your persuasiveness.
2007-02-28 02:54:13 · answer #5 · answered by OE "800" 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
-3 seeing as they have nothing to do with each other.
2007-02-28 02:52:57 · answer #6 · answered by Doctor Slernon 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
she sounds like she needs help. picking on people to make ones self feel good because she is unhappy. people like that has issues and need help.i give her a 10.
2007-02-28 02:57:23 · answer #7 · answered by igive2shhhhhhhhhhhhh 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋