2007-02-27 17:05:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Controlled Demolition.
2007-02-27 17:18:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I've done a lot of research into this Nancy. Your constant, repetitive, insightful questions have led me to really dig into the vast, world-wide conspiracy behind 9/11.
The controlled demolition is only PART of it! I found that the Bushes were indeed responsible for wiring the WTC with explosives (through Haliburton), with Karl Rove calling the specific scheduling and making sure that the 'right' people were both in, and out, of the buildings on the appropriate days.
The JEWS were behind Haliburton - where do you think the money came from?
And when you follow the MONEY, it goes back to the giant multinational trading firms in the WTC - They paid to have THEMSELVES blown up!! It's the conspiracy NOBODY can talk about because it's too insane for words!
Kinda like your questions.
Orion
2007-02-28 01:38:38 · answer #2 · answered by Orion 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you look at the aerial photography taken of ground zero you can see a trail of rubble leading from the two main buildings to building 7. There was definitely structural damage to the buildings in between building 7 and the twin towers. The way it looked to me was that the debris would have fallen on non-critical areas of the other buildings, while it appeared that the debree was leading a trail directly to the center of building 7, which could explain why it collapsed and other buildings did not.
2007-02-28 01:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by David R 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A better question: Why didn't the fire crews and rescuer workers notice the neat pile of fine dust amongst all the concrete rubble and steel girders?
2007-02-28 01:22:57 · answer #4 · answered by Liberal Larry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let us know how YOU would hold up when a million tons of concrete and steel crash down on YOUR shoulders. Ever for a moment think that after it had all that debris hit it that the structural integrity was compromised to the point that the building failed? In other words, enough shi!t hit it that if fell down. You need help.
2007-02-28 01:43:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A nice little pile of fine dust huh? You really have no concept of reality do you.
How much are terrorists paying you to spew their smut? Your husband must be so proud.
2007-02-28 12:01:11 · answer #6 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
One theory I tend to believe is that it was controlled demolition AFTER the attacks rendered that building unsafe.Until someone comes up with actual PROOF this is what I would go with.
2007-02-28 01:12:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nancy, if you go to Graceland and visit Elvis' grave you will find the answers you so desperately seek. Get thee to Memphis now.
2007-02-28 01:19:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Cheney thought it was a quail.
2007-02-28 05:14:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm
2007-02-28 01:16:35 · answer #10 · answered by independent101 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋