Who do you suppose Spoke and set it all in motion? You are correct. Without Intelligence, the universe could never have come to be.
Nevertheless, Steven Hawking is continuing his search for the prime cause of the Bang. Too bad he can't see what's right in front of him. Mathmatics isn't God. But it certainly points toward Him.
2007-02-27 17:06:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ok. The laws of conservation of matter and energy do not apply on the scales we are talking about. Matter can be converted to energy, energy can be converted to matter. This was discovered about 1946 when they were creating the atomic bombs and proved with the first detonation. That matter and energy can actually come out of nothing took them longer to proove but it was done at CERN in the late eighties I think. So your first two statements are simply wrong by being out of date, Sorry.
Now yes ok everything was there and the expansion that was the big bang happened everywhere at the same time. OK.
Love, personality, hate, greed, intelligence? Please define and explain these terms.
Science is for dealing with how. Religion is for dealing with why. They have no common ground at all.
Science has no need to know why a snowflake exists, it only need to know how it does.
Religion has no need to know how the snowflake exists, it only needs a reason why it exists. It can be to serve man or to Glorify God. It does not even need to make sense because we have been giving religion a free ride for at least two millenia. It is time for them toi begin pulling their weight again and giving us reasons why we should keep trying to keep this planet livable.
2007-02-28 01:13:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by U-98 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Words like "hate" "love" "greed"- those are descriptions of feelings you get from various chemicals and electrical impulses passed through your brain. They do not exist outside of Language, and are made up of atoms created by the energy expelled by the Big Bang. Whether these energies were created by the Big Bang or always existed and are simply part of a BigBang-BigCrunch cycle is speculation, but don't confuse language with matter/energy.
That's like saying, "I know matter can't be created or destroyed, but what about the verb 'to be?' " These are different concepts and shouldn't be confused.
So problem solved. Just don't overcomplicate things. Philosophy is a man made concept.
2007-02-28 01:05:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by dmlk2 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
The problem with the big bang theory is that in order for it to work, you have to throw physics out the window until a certain point when everything has coalesced into some semblance of the matter we see today.
The problem of asking if it makes sence, is that it is a theory about past occurances that cannot be proven, disproven or replicated because someone will always be able to find some sort of technicality that will allow them to continue to use the theory.
There are in fact many ideas floating around out there for the origin of the universe, and none of them can explain everything. Personally, I take the word of the one who witnessed it himself and had the events recorded for all to read in his holy word (aka the bible).
And I don't think these orders that you listed can come about out of chaos, as that would in fact counter the nature of the univers as described in the 2nd law of thermodynamics and several points of information theory.
2007-02-28 01:06:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by acaykath 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you take a look at Hinduism you will find that the Big Bang was just the start of a new cycle!
That is, the end of the previous universe / age and the start of the current one!
There will be another big bang when the current universe collapses and the next one is born.
.
2007-02-28 01:06:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not to be disrespectful, but I have yet to see any religion or scientific explanation that proves everything. I've made what I call the Mary Theory! I think that the human mind may not be capable of fathoming the truth of our universe and it's creation. Who knows? We could all be living in our own universe which actually turns out to just be a cell of another being!! As far as I'm concerned, we could just as well have oompa-loompas working within us (which is why I also like to call it the Oompa Loompa theory!!). However, I respect all ideas and religions.
2007-02-28 01:10:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Captain Oblivious 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm not scientist but wasn't the big bang theory disproved?
Anyhow, from a logical point-of-view it would only be possible that these traits you question evolved as everything else did. There was no love before there was a creature that could love.
From my personal view. All of these things, and our world, came from God.
2007-02-28 01:01:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by dreamdawg83 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
intelligence had to be there...if you take all the materials to build a house (plumbing,electrical,even decorative materials) threw them up in the air would they come down put together in a sturdy well put together home or just a pile of stuff. I don't believe anything was random in the creation of the universe including our emotions and human characteristics.
2007-02-28 01:13:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing in this current physical universe was before the big bang, unless it is the result of another universe. There was no space or time, maybe only God which would not be part of the physical universe anyways.
2007-02-28 01:02:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
This is one of the most anthrocentric questions I've read in a long time. You are so full of yourself, you think the universe revolves around you.
In the grand scheme of the universe, you don't matter any more than the dust mites living in your pillow.
And neither do I.
^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
2007-02-28 00:59:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
3⤊
0⤋