No, it doesn't surprise me at all. I heard about it a couple of days ago. For some reason, it still isn't getting much attention. That doesn't surprise me much either. The ACLU wrote the book on protecting sickos. I guess it was some nasty work. Forcible rape of preteen girls.
The ACLU. The ultimate terrorist cell. Skilled. Motivated. Ruthless. Legal.
2007-02-27 17:42:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ah, ACLU. The worst four letters in the Alphabet. His arrest adds new meaning to the word "Liberal".
2007-02-27 22:28:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tom M 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
As the ACLU was founded by a communist, and has had gay people as former presidents, and defended NAMBLA pro bono, nothing they do surprises me. Sickens me, yes, but surprises me, never.
2007-02-27 18:54:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing the ACLU or its membership does surprises me.
2007-02-27 17:23:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. and that i think of it is appropriate to the wonderful question that Yahoo has even allowed to publish on the undertaking. stunning interest, Ernie. extra, i don't see the Liberals screaming approximately it. curiously, baby sexual abuse purely bothers them whilst some perverted Republican does it.
2016-10-16 22:21:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doesn't surprise me. They represent and defend people that do horrible things all in the name of freedom of rights. I am sure he thought he was doing nothing wrong.
2007-02-28 05:38:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jill R 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see nothing wrong with what he did, he should be forgiven and re-instated. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks. Everyone deserves a second chance regardless of their affilliation with positive pro-rights groups. You goose steppin' nazis need to lighten up a bit...
2007-02-28 14:13:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gene 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
It certainly explains why they fight so vigorously for the rights of convicted sex offenders, they are just looking out for themselves.
2007-02-28 06:04:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jester 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Explains, yeat again, why liberals are so quick to support NAMBLA
2007-02-27 16:25:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
thats one liberal in 342464635645345 repubs
law of numbers says it has to happen somtime
2007-02-27 16:21:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kevy 7
·
1⤊
5⤋