English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

-The universe came into exsistance...somehow.
-The was already a mass or wave that created it from an unknown source.
-An unknown thing put that mass or wave in motion
-The mass or wave made trillions of stars and planets
-One planet happened to have water, like no other planet in the universe.
-One planet had the precise gravatational alignment to not destroy itself.
-One planet could support life from a source: the sun at precise temperatures
-One planet has an ozone with a special 4-layer design
-One planet eventually created lifeforms as small cells
-These cells somehow became monkies after asexually reproducing.
-The monkies began to sexually reproduce
-The monkies became humans naturally undergoing drastic physical/mental changes over millions of years.
-The new formed humans, since the beginning of cultures, had some sort of religion (except for some Australians)
-This species now has the idea that all of this occurred, instead of the simple conclustion: God did it.

2007-02-27 14:00:59 · 18 answers · asked by Doug 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Oh yeah...

please add this: 1x10^108 for the statistical chances of Jesus fulfilling the prophecies of the OT (Recorded by a non-christian scientist in 1963)

2007-02-27 14:05:37 · update #1

Please don't use God as an excuse for all the things you don't understand.
-----------------

Huh? God is the answer, not the excuse.

2007-02-27 14:07:55 · update #2

Chesire... I think 5 years of total science (3 branches)/biology/chemistry should make me a bit more educated in this particular subject...

2007-02-27 14:10:35 · update #3

18 answers

0%.

You place monkeys before sexual reproduction.

Further, you make no clear distinction between the Universe and the visible universe. There is a distinction.

And what is this 'mas or wave' of which you speak?


I smell a strawman here.

2007-02-27 14:06:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I don't know. All I can assume is the factor of sense of each one of those.

The universe came into exisence-somehow. Sure, makes sense, it wouldn't make sense it came into existence out of nothing, but somehow, sure, because it's here.

If the wave was already here, it would have been created, so you have a circular loop going of what created the wave.

Okay basically this is some intelligent thinking but I don't want to answer all of these because I don't know where you stand on them. What do you think the statistical chance of these occuring, since they already did occur. Which leads me to the important question: why care? Why do you care about any of these? What is your point? What is your explanation regarding creation (your theory on existence existing)?

2007-02-27 22:09:53 · answer #2 · answered by Julian 6 · 0 0

Don't you think that it is a little arrogant to assume that Earth is the only planet in the universe capable of sustaining life? There might even be water on Mars, and some think that Mars once had life on it.

2007-02-27 22:07:31 · answer #3 · answered by Kneedeepinlife 3 · 2 1

1. far beyond impossible.Anyone with a stitch of honesty must conclude the universe has intricate design, therefore it must have a designer.2. I know that the chances of one man fulfilling only 8 of those prophesies is about 1 in 100 trillion.

2007-02-27 22:12:32 · answer #4 · answered by W J 3 · 1 2

It's far likely than a giant invisible man in the sky getting bored one day and farting the universe into existence.

2007-02-27 22:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Since you're talking of evolution, the chances that God did all of that is ZERO.
God is created life in His image. That sounds more plausible than evolution.

2007-02-27 22:07:48 · answer #6 · answered by n9wff 6 · 2 1

I believe that God was the big bang. Then He walked away and evolution took over.

We evolved from a similar ancestor as the apes, sir. Please read it for yourself.

I mean no disrespect to you Doug, because I don't see you ever disrespecting anyone else.

2007-02-27 22:06:24 · answer #7 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 1 1

Pretty much zero. Sexual reproduction far preceded multicellular life, much less monkeys. Thank you for showing that Creationism is a total crock.

2007-02-27 22:07:25 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1 1

The age-old Argument from Incredulity: "I cannot comprehend how this happened, so it must have been God!"

Commonly known among atheists as (jokingly) 'godidit'.

Edit: Statistically, the odds are apparently good enough of this happening, seeing that it did happen.

Statistically, the odds of this happening are greater than the odds of God - specifically yours - existing!

2007-02-27 22:09:09 · answer #9 · answered by Nowhere Man 6 · 3 2

Dishonest strawman alert!

Try to come up with an honest question and I will take you seriously.

2007-02-27 22:15:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers