I like it snipped, but I just think its a bit clean and nicer looking.
2007-03-01 05:26:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Before you have this procedure done you should know that there is a very real risk of loss of sensitivity as this study shows.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=16037710&query_hl=2&itool=pubmed_docsum
Exerpts from the report:
Masood S, Patel HR, Himpson RC, Palmer JH, Mufti GR, Sheriff MK.
OBJECTIVES: Currently no consensus exists about the role of the foreskin or the effect circumcision has on penile sensitivity and overall sexual satisfaction. Our study assesses the effect of circumcision on sexually active men and the relative impact this may have on informed consent prior to surgery.
Penile sensation improved after circumcision in 38% (p = 0.01) but got worse in 18%, with the remainder having no change. Overall satisfaction was 61%.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile sensitivity had variable outcomes after circumcision. The poor outcome of circumcision considered by overall satisfaction rates suggests that when we circumcise men, these outcome data should be discussed during the informed consent process. 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
I would recomend getting a second opinion before having this done, it is very rare to actually need to have the foreskin amputated. Competent doctors can treat an intact penis without cutting. One out of five men circumcised suffers loss of sensitivity and one out of three is not satisfied with the results, these are not very good odds. There has to be better treatments available.
I would point out that while this study shows that adult men should be warned of the possibility of sensitivity loss before they can give "informed consent" to circumcision, there is no way that a newborn boy can give his informed consent to an elective procedure that has a 1 in 5 chance of leaving him with an impaired sex-life.
His body. His choice.
2007-02-28 21:12:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I prefer uncircumcised. but if a man is circumcised what's done is done so that's ok. i like unaltered genitals, i think they look fine and work fine they way they are.
2007-03-01 07:10:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
not circumsized ;-)
honestly though ive never had a bf WITH a circumsized woohoo so i cant really give an answer, i just know that it wouldnt feel the same in some ways because of teh foreskin etc.. alot of chicks dont like the foreskin because they think its dirty etc, unless your bf/guy doesnt wash daily etc then you shouldnt really have a problem about it!! i think my bf woohoo is hott as!!
2007-02-28 22:24:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by WomanSoHeartless 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
not,cuz sensation obliterates
2007-02-28 12:43:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by anis118030 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
it dosn't matter it still works the same, for us it dosn't matter, its just how you would feel and would prefer
2007-02-28 08:58:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by pinklinz@btinternet.com 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Uncircumcised, there is no reason for it to be otherwise.
2007-03-01 19:09:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Redheadinbed 2
·
4⤊
1⤋