Do you all think I am a good photographer?

Question

I have taken photographs for friends and family, but I'm not sure if they are telling me the truth, what do you think??

http://www.ringo.com/photos/photo.html?photoId=198704943

http://www.ringo.com/photos/photo.html?photoId=198704955

http://www.ringo.com/photos/photo.html?photoId=198705008

http://www.ringo.com/photos/photo.html?photoId=198708833

Answer 1

It is hard for those who know and love you to be objective. I will offer a quick critique, but remember, art is subjective, and different people like different things!
#1: Stiffly posed, uncomfortable looking. Lacking in contrast, and the point of view is looking up her nostrils. This sort of photo is generally better shot from very slightly above eye level. The lighting in this one leaves a lot to be desired.

#2 is the best, good posing and expression. Lighting is a little flat, but no dark shadow under the cowgirl hat, that is a big plus. I don't care for the edge effect at all, but, again, that sort of thing is personal. Many folks would love it!

#3: The photoshop work here is horrid. (Sorry to be blunt) Also, the lighting suffers again. I would like to see the original of this one.

#4 is out of focus. Otherwise, decent. Not a keeper, though, because of the focus issues.

I think you have ability, and you should keep on shooting! I would recommend going to the book store or library and getting a couple of beginning photography books. Also google Zeltsman photography, (posing basics, dated wardrobe, but good posing hasn't changed); Monte Zuker (great site for lighting and posing, he is primarily a wedding photographer) and visit www.nyip.com, and www.kodak.com for great tips and tutorials. Another great book is "Understanding Exposure" by Bryan Peterson.

Take care, and good luck!

Answer 2

#1: Flat. Needs conrast. Needs better lighting. Awkward pose. Uninspiring model
#2: Over-done. The 'fancy' frame does this no favours at all. Had potential at one time but ruined by 'playful' modifications.
#3: Obviously fake
#4: Aside from a number of other considerations, blurred. Or did you mean it to be like this.

You should study known high-quality images and ask yourself WHY they are good.
You should read about composition rules and conventions.
You should keep shooting but aim to gradually improve by analyzing why you are not matching the high standards you are aiming for.
You should forget ringo. Pointless.
You should post on a recognised photo-critique site, where, on a daily basis, experienced photographers, including current and former professionals, will be honest with you.
Asking on this site is a one-off stab and, if you are really enthusiastic, you need a daily input from those who know what they are talking about. It's easy.

Answer 3

Yes, you are. Your composition is nice. That is key to become a good photographer.

However, you used to much photoshop, especially on men face.

Answer 4

I think you have a good eye from the first few pictures I saw. Try different lenses and why not use photoshop.

Keep it up :)

Answer 5

I would need to see some of your pics first. Post them in a new question.

Answer 6

the pics look good. just watch your back grounds the third pic has a tree growing out of her head.

Answer 7

these pics are ok... i would suggest that you play around with the lighting and work on more natural poses

Answer 8

yes

Answer 9

I think you are a awesome photographer, keep it up.