2007-02-27 07:32:06 · 11 answers · asked by topdog 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Yes, however the officer should not be involved in the investigation in any way (conflict of interests).
2007-02-27 07:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes and in law there would be nothing to stop the related officer being involved,but in practice he would not be for obvious reasons.It cant be made law because some stations have very few officers and the accused couldnt be held indefinately.
2007-02-27 20:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by frankturk50 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The accused can be questioned at the police station, as long as the police officer in question is not involved. But, why be questioned at the police station? You do not need to answer questions there unless you volunteer to go there. Answer the questions at your house, at work, your lawyers office, wherever you are comfortable. It is not like on TV where they bring you downtown because they think you did something, you have to volunteer to go and you can leave at anytime you want to.
2007-02-27 08:30:41 · answer #3 · answered by cop.cop11 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sure they can, as long as the officer who is the relative of the victim does not do the interview.
2007-02-27 11:08:03 · answer #4 · answered by joeanonymous 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes but the officer who is related to the victim can not participate in any way!
2007-02-27 07:58:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
only if the relative of the victim does not do the questionning
2007-02-27 07:35:41 · answer #6 · answered by friendofb 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, However the relative should not be present.
2007-02-27 07:55:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes an accused can be questioned where the crime took place. no law against it.
2007-02-27 07:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by Shelly t 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-02-27 07:36:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not advised by most district attornys on the grounds of 'conflict -of-intrest. It's legall but the outcome can be disputed heavily in court,
2007-02-27 07:37:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋