English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...why hasn't a Creationist won the Nobel Prize or been published in any peer reviewed scientific journals?

Seeing as scientists pick and choose the evidence that supports their theories (according to the majority of Christian thought), why hasnt Creationism been proven yet?

2007-02-27 05:47:34 · 22 answers · asked by YDoncha_Blowme 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Einstein was a Christian? Nice lie there buddy. Keep that myth going strong why dont you! The rest of your post lacks merit based upon the simple fact that Einstein was NOT a Christian.

2007-02-27 06:00:35 · update #1

I never said a CHRISTIAN hasnt won the Nobel Prize - I said a CREATIONIST. Those Christians that have won a Nobel - won it for scientific progresses that didnt include "God did it all!" Also, I never said that Christians have never been published - I said that CREATIONISTS havent been published in scientific journals.

2007-02-27 06:04:15 · update #2

A "list of scientists who dispute Darwinism AND have been published" is not the same as a Creationist who has been published IN A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL. Ive had worked published before - does that make me a person who has published inside a scientific journal?

2007-02-27 06:06:33 · update #3

22 answers

Because science is a Satanic conspiracy, except when geologist find oil or biologist discover the cure for a disease or archaeologist find the remains of something mentioned in the bible.

2007-02-27 05:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by October 7 · 4 3

Why don't you actually ask an actual question instead of just picking a fight?

Since you deliberately target Christian thought, rather than Creationsim, I would suggest that you look into the Intelligent Design debate. Many Christians do accept Evolutions, and there are many Christian Scientists. They see Evolution, not as a negation of God, but as the most awesome example of his world. That in fact, true divinity and science is inseparable. Albert Einstein believed in an higher power, and I seem to recall him garnering a couple accolades. Or at least depending on which magazine quoted him.

Also, I would suggest that you look into the question of what caused the Big Bang. It remains unanswered to this day, since no known scientific formula can adequately address the need for infinite energy, and every model which supposedly could, breaks down under basic laws of physics. (Like a ball not bouncing higher on its 5th bounce, then its 2nd).

Beyond that, Creationist culture, and the culture that revolves around peer reviewed scientific journals are very different. Though I think the latter would be just as disgusted by your rather disengenuous approach.

EDIT: I typoed in regards to Einsten. What I meant was that he was able to reconcile belief in an higher power with science. That said. There are many conflicting quotations regarding his beliefs. Though, there are plenty of other examples.

2007-02-27 13:54:37 · answer #2 · answered by Ajax J 2 · 3 2

For the same reason that evolution has not been "Proven" yet. Evolution is still a theory and not a fact because while it has strong indications to being correct, not all aspects of evolution can be proved or demonstrated.

Honestly, people, quit trying to pit science against religion and religion against science. You will not ever come to an agreement in either until all things are revealed to us from God. Instead, the two should go hand in hand as religion tells us what and why. Science tells us how.

But since science is largely a study done by man, it will always be fallible. True religion will lead you to all truth no matter what the field of study.

2007-02-27 14:04:46 · answer #3 · answered by rbarc 4 · 1 2

I'm not able at the moment to find a list of Christian Nobel Prize winners, but I'm sure there have been some.

However, your statement that none have been published in any peer reviewed scientific journals is incorrect.

Here's a list of highly reputable scientists who dispute Darwinism is factual. The majority of these are published authors:

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=660

EDIT: Ummm, you apparantly don't know that most tenured professors are REQUIRED to publish in scientific journals. It's not as if I suggested these scientists published in the Ladies' Home Journal, for goodness sake! It's common logic to know that SCIENTISTS publish in SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS.

2007-02-27 13:59:52 · answer #4 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 2 3

Because they do not want it proven.
The Creation/Evolutiona debate is not about Science so much as it is about Philosphy.

Let me give you an example by asking you this question,
Would you mind or get angry in any way shape or form, if all of the Evolutionary scientist would come forth and say they were wrong and creationism is real? would you be angry?, would you deny it? refuse to accept it? really, answer that question not to me but to yourself.

Mankind (secular mankind) does not want a set of rules or morals to live by or anyone telling him what is right and what is wrong, man does not want any Absolutes, so mankind fabricates science and other things to substantiate that belief and brainwash themselves into believing it to "make him feel better" because man does not want to live according to God's laws and ways but wants to go his own way.

So you see, Creationism can be proven, and has been, but all those Nobel prizes and Scientific Journals you place so much credibility in will never ever admit it.

There has been a host of FORMER Evolutionary Scientist who have come over to Creationism after they had learned the truth about the lie of Evolution and the Conspiracy to "cover it up" but when these Scientist came forth, they were de-nounced, and of course since the mainstream media is Largly Athiest and liberal, they will never get any pres coverage,
Face it, evolution is a farce, and the Secular world has brainwashed many into believing a lie.

2007-02-27 14:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I don't see why there is a problem with Christians and evolution. The creation of the earth, and the length of days of creation, could be any amount of time--millions of years. In the Bible, it says that God made animals, each to its own kind.

If you study the various mammals in Australia, the Galapagos Islands, and elsewhere--you will see that, although their genetics are extremely different--there are moles, guneau pigs, birds, etc. that look very much the same. They are each to their own kind--as God intended.

Contrary to your view, there are many Christian scientists.

2007-02-27 14:00:38 · answer #6 · answered by Faith 4 · 1 2

Scientists are always looking for ways to push humanity forward so they get prizes, i don't think Religious persons should get awards or prizes if all they seem to want is to keep all of us in the dark ages.

2007-02-27 14:02:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Hitler also won the Times 'Man of the year' title in 1938.

2007-02-27 13:58:26 · answer #8 · answered by gnostic 4 · 2 1

Who said there is no such thing as evolution? It's just that you guys don't understand what evolution really is. Man and woman were created by a Supreme Being. Get over it.

2007-02-27 13:52:41 · answer #9 · answered by garo g 3 · 2 3

Dude it will never be proven. Christians believe you have to have "faith", which is kinda silly when it's been disproven by scientific fact. You'll never get them to admit it.

2007-02-27 13:52:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers