Just wondering what you think. I mean, that's a pretty big carbon footprint, don't you think?
2007-02-27 04:02:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
It's a house for two people...
2007-02-27 04:13:46 · update #1
The motivation for my question... http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=nation_world&id=5072659
2007-02-27 04:19:30 · update #2
Noooo of course not. Those rules only apply to us peons and serfs not the enlightened class.
2007-02-27 06:59:36 · answer #1 · answered by dennis s 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's irresponsible for someone to have a large living space. It's irreponsible to withhold so much wealth.
It is in fact a boon to renewable industries in his locale because tha tmeans big business for them. That means these businesses will put more money into expanding and developing sustainable technologies.
2007-02-27 13:42:20 · answer #2 · answered by justin_at_shr 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It certainly is. Modern housing construction has gotten way out of control. People are building houses way bigger than they actually need and in many cases way bigger than they can really afford. I don't understand the gigantic houses with the dinky little yards. If you want bragging rights build a nice house with a big yard and don't waste a ton of energy heating and cooling your mammoth abode.
2007-02-27 12:15:41 · answer #3 · answered by brenda h 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course it's irresponsible, ... but so are his limos and jets, ... after all, the guy also claimed to invent the internet, he should be able to do anything he needs to do from a wind powered keyboard - LOL.
2007-02-27 12:13:52 · answer #4 · answered by Owlchemy_ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow. Who in the heck would waste that much energy? ...Oh yeah..Al Gore lol. And he isn't even home most of the time. he's on his private jet warming up the place. What a hypocrite he is.
2007-02-27 12:11:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah I think thats insane, and unecessary unless you plan on having homeless people living with you and use the space responsibly
2007-02-27 12:06:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the number of people that are housed there. It's all relative man.
2007-02-27 12:10:19 · answer #7 · answered by csucdartgirl 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That sounds like a blast, sounds like a good party house. What was the question again?
2007-02-27 12:14:35 · answer #8 · answered by Mindrape 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, but it sure it is hypocritical for our someone who invented global warming.
2007-02-27 12:09:08 · answer #9 · answered by JimZ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Irresponsible is an understatement........
2007-02-27 13:23:16 · answer #10 · answered by bailey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋