English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The drinking game list:

1. If man came from monkeys . . . .
2. Jim Darwin self referential questions
3. Paschals wager
4. Atheists why are you in this section
5. Jesus tomb/Jesus bones

---

Should the game now have participants taking one or two questions, and thus it is now a true "game",

ie - I would take question 3 and 4 and drink a shot of rum on those questions, etc. and then whoever is last yahoo answeror playing not in the hospital with alcohol poison would win.

Does this sound more refined?

2007-02-27 02:49:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

I've got my shot glass ready, but all I have here in the office is Bailey's. I wouldn't last too long with that stuff.

2007-02-27 03:19:11 · answer #1 · answered by Sookie 6 · 2 0

Anyone who takes question 5 will be in hospital within the hour at this rate.

But why are you limiting each participant to only 2 questions? Aren't drinking games meant to encourage as much drinking as possible?

And by self referential, are you talking about circular arguments?

I'll take #1-4 inclusive. I don't think my liver can take #5 at the moment

2007-02-27 02:55:08 · answer #2 · answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6 · 0 0

So you actually think that all of these scientists are just out of their mind? You hear all about evolution and go ha that is rubbish? Well let me pose it another way. If god just put us here, why are there so many other near human life form fossils found all over the world (homo erectus). Why do we have 95% the same genetic code? Why is it that we have a 10 times closer relationship between man and chimp than a rat to a mouse. Do you think a rat and mouse could have evolved seperately?

2007-02-27 02:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by Ordin 3 · 0 1

That'd be great on a late weekend night.

But it would probally wipe out a lot of the players from the section, and the answers might look as if "tragic typo's" had gotten ahold of everyones ID that night.

2007-02-27 03:12:10 · answer #4 · answered by G's Random Thoughts 5 · 0 0

No one would be sober enough to type.

But it would definitely be quite the drinking game.

I would definitely take #3, mostly because anyone can disprove that while drunk.

I'd like to add another to the list: Proof of God's existence by the fact that plants exist. I love those "arguments." After all, if someone can "prove" that God exists with that, then I can "prove" that Odin exists.

2007-02-27 02:53:19 · answer #5 · answered by Rev Kev 5 · 1 0

Lets say animal A lives in habitat A...then out of mutation animal B forms...these animals then migrate to habitat B...but in habitat B animal B is has da survival of the fittest due to the environment n other factors...then animal B will survive there...and lets say habitat A suits animal A...then animal A lives in habitat A while animal B lives in habitat B...they both can coexist...its call natural selection...

2007-02-27 02:58:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

think of of them as monkeys. Then think of of your popular image of a monkey (scratching himself.) Then think of of your bosses....and how heavily appropriate they are. Then pass exterior & take a walk around the development -- seem for something fairly or nature -- & permit it sink in. then you will sense somewhat extra suited. And be responsive to what we've all been there too.

2016-10-02 01:56:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't understand the game. In any event, evolution is a proven fact, and monkeys exist because there is a niche in the environment in which they fit.

2007-02-27 02:55:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i ALready strted this today. Man I fell good sinnce I have alrdy had 10 shotssssssss. And I am stll smart enogh to realize evolution is coorrect and creationism is hilariously dumb.

2007-02-27 03:30:52 · answer #9 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 0

Monkeys still exist because there were few monkeys who used to live in a favourable condition for them, so they did not evolved and remained monkey...Darwin's theory is too simple to understand for humans, I dont know about monkeys understanding about this.

2007-02-27 02:55:19 · answer #10 · answered by Sam- the "big boss" 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers