I've never liked much of South America. Brazil is a nice place, but the rest of it could be obliterated, as far as I'm concerned. I think our long-term imperial strategy is too murky, at this point. Naturally, we will have to deal with France within the next decade, but I don't think a ground invasion will be needed at that time.
2007-02-27 02:31:08 · 18 answers · asked by one_dog_grinning 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
your house
2007-02-27 02:35:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anon 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Russia of curse i'd love to see the red necks freeze in the russian winter, dying slow and painfully. Or with China just imagine the blood spilled. Bu the best is that the nuclear war will destroy US, the new ICBM of russia the Topol M can avoid missiles and is resistent to electromagnetic weapons and lassers. Imagine New York and Washington nuked. Well al the planet would die but is better die than share the world with those rednecks
2007-02-27 11:57:52 · answer #2 · answered by maravilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We will not destroy Modern day Iran alias Persia,They along with
Arabs-Russia have an appointment in Israel.It was made 2500 yrs ago,The Question of who holds deed to Palestine will be no longer a Question.God will reveal to the Nations with a Mighty Hail storm,Israel can sit this one out. Eze 38 &39
2007-02-27 11:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by section hand 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should try to fix up your own country, invading others means there is something really wrong about it. There is always the boomerang effect, remember, you may suffer an unwanted invasion from who knows who in the future. I don't think you would like that at all. South America is beautiful, so is the whole planet. Who makes it ugly are the people who love to hate others and impose their views and force upon those who think different.
2007-02-27 02:42:50 · answer #4 · answered by Marcos M 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've always thought that we've taken far too long to address the threat that Canada poses. And then maybe all we'd have to do is announce that we're going to invade France, they'd probably just surrender.
2007-02-27 02:36:09 · answer #5 · answered by Michael L 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liecthenstein! Easy win, great cheese, I hear.
I do like the Bahamas idea too. Malta wouldn't be a bad idea either, and more strategically important than the Bahamas.
2007-02-27 02:41:25 · answer #6 · answered by Leo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
France? Bunch of drunk sissies. I think since we're already there Patton would say KICK Iran around some before we leave the region.
2007-02-27 02:36:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do you need to destroy Iran? If so do you understand why?
Click the "add details" button and add some information that will make me believe you're a grown-up.
2007-02-27 02:35:08 · answer #8 · answered by bonshui 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say we invade the Bahamas. South America rocks, and your comment is not very accurate.
2007-02-27 02:56:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jamaica for strategic weed purposes and then Aruba for tropical fruity drinks with naked party freak purposes. After that...hmmm....Icleand because their life expectancy is higher than ours. Gotta bring it down a notch or two. Plus, the cold air will clear our heads after all the weed, umbrella drinks, and orgies.
2007-02-27 02:57:10 · answer #10 · answered by Laoshu Laoshi 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Let's just keep going. The campaign will be called "The Freedom and Democracy Rout ( or Route)" and it won't stop until east of California...the heart of all that's wrong in America...
viva the American Redneck......
2007-02-27 02:57:29 · answer #11 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋