English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i saw there are lot question about that bones,so i want to see pictures of it.show me some please

2007-02-27 01:56:30 · 10 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

i'm a muslim,so i will sinned if believe there are jesus bones,because muslim believe jesus still alive.but,i'm still want see that allegedly claimed jesus bones.

2007-02-27 02:09:42 · update #1

10 answers

When Jesus died he also came back to life. He is alive...he is living in heaven. So he still has his bones. Sorry.

2007-02-27 02:02:52 · answer #1 · answered by horsesareforever 3 · 2 2

Why bother? The whole thing is a fake. That's what the archaeologists -- who, unlike James Cameron, know what they're talking about -- are saying in the news reports.

Cameron is a filmmaker. He is not an archaeologist or a scholar of ancient Palestine.

For heaven's sake, don't believe everything you read -- and don't believe everything you see on film, even if it's called a "documentary."

Cameron's "documentary" about "Jesus' bones" is no more factually reliable than any of Michael Moore's "documentaries."

.

2007-02-27 02:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

While there are pictures of the boxes, the actual bones were removed in 1980 when they were discovered and reburied.

Note that Kloner, the person who actually found the bones, has denounced the upcoming special as a fake and "only out for money", and says it is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts of his discovery.

2007-02-27 02:13:57 · answer #3 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 0 0

James Cameron's attempting to get his occupation back on course by giving the audience something jarring and arguable (and all of us comprehend how television in basic terms LOVES controversy, no rely if it extremely is unquestionably based in something significant or no longer). EDIT: i did no longer see this, yet how in the international did he be certain that the maintains to be he got here upon (if that's what the coach grow to be approximately) have been Jesus'? Did he discover DNA samples of Jesus in basic terms mendacity around with which he ought to evaluate them to? grow to be he granted permission by the Vatican to scientifically learn the blood stains on the Shroud of Turin (which sound even much less in all danger)?

2016-11-26 01:53:51 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Not sure but the documentary "The Tomb of Jesus" will air this Sunday March 4th at 9:00pm EST on the Discovery Channel.

2007-02-27 02:01:35 · answer #5 · answered by Stormilutionist Chasealogist 6 · 0 0

Feb. 26, 2007, 2:11PM
James Cameron's Lost Tomb of Christ faces criticism


By KAREN MATTHEWS
Associated Press

TOOLS
Email Get section feed
Print Subscribe NOW
NEW YORK — Filmmakers and researchers on Monday unveiled two ancient stone boxes they said may have once contained the remains of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, but several scholars derided the claims made in a new documentary as unfounded and contradictory to basic Christian beliefs.

"The Lost Tomb of Jesus," produced by Oscar-winning director James Cameron and scheduled to air March 4 on the Discovery Channel, argues that 10 small caskets discovered in 1980 in a Jerusalem suburb may have held the bones of Jesus and his family.

One of the caskets even bears the title, "Judah, son of Jesus," hinting that Jesus may have had a son, according to the film.

"There's a definite sense that you have to pinch yourself," Cameron said Monday at a news conference. He told NBC'S "Today" show earlier that statisticians found "in the range of a couple of million to one" in favor of the documentary's conclusions about the caskets, or ossuaries.

Simcha Jacobovici, the Toronto filmmaker who directed the film, said that a name on one of the ossuaries — "Mariamene" — offers evidence that the tomb is that of Jesus and his family. In early Christian texts, "Mariamene" is the name of Mary Magdalene, he said.

The very fact that Jesus had an ossuary would contradict the Christian belief that he was resurrected and ascended to heaven.

Most Christians believe Jesus' body spent three days at the site of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem's Old City. The burial site identified in Cameron's documentary is in a southern Jerusalem neighborhood nowhere near the church.

In 1996, when the British Broadcasting Corp. aired a short documentary on the same subject, archaeologists challenged the claims. Amos Kloner, the first archaeologist to examine the site, said the idea fails to hold up by archaeological standards but makes for profitable television.

"They just want to get money for it," Kloner said.

Shimon Gibson, one of three archaeologists who first discovered the tomb in 1980, said Monday of the film's claims: "I'm skeptical, but that's the way I am. I'm willing to accept the possibility."

The film's claims, however, have raised the ire of Christian leaders in the Holy Land.

Stephen Pfann, a biblical scholar at the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem who was interviewed in the documentary, said the film's hypothesis holds little weight.

"I don't think that Christians are going to buy into this," Pfann said. "But skeptics, in general, would like to see something that pokes holes into the story that so many people hold dear."

"How possible is it?" Pfann said. "On a scale of one through 10 — 10 being completely possible — it's probably a one, maybe a one and a half."

Pfann is even unsure that the name "Jesus" on the caskets was read correctly. He thinks it's more likely the name "Hanun." Ancient Semitic script is notoriously difficult to decipher.

Kloner also said the filmmakers' assertions are false. "The names on the caskets are the most common names found among Jews at the time," he said.

William Dever, an expert on near eastern archaeology and anthropology, who has worked with Israeli archeologists for five decades, said specialists have known about the ossuaries for years.

"The fact that it's been ignored tells you something," said Dever, professor emeritus at the University of Arizona. "It would be amusing if it didn't mislead so many people."

Osnat Goaz, a spokeswoman for the Israeli government agency responsible for archaeology, said the Antiquities Authority agreed to send two ossuaries to New York, but they did not contain human remains. "We agreed to send the ossuaries, but it doesn't mean that we agree with" the filmmakers, she said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Associated Press Writer Marshall Thompson contributed to this report from Jerusalem and AP Religion Writer Rachel Zoll

2007-02-27 02:11:06 · answer #6 · answered by williamzo 5 · 0 0

I've only seen photos of the ossuaries. I don't believe they've shown photos of the bones.

2007-02-27 02:02:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it may be that the bones are not Jesus, but another memeber of the family

2007-02-27 02:04:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

try the local butcher,he should have some.

2007-02-27 02:02:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in heaven. hehe

2007-02-27 01:59:53 · answer #10 · answered by captain jack sparrow 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers