look on how these faithless people try thier best to hide the truth .
this is nonsense and it really has to have a limit .
Behold amoung you i bring you wolves (these are wolves that we are talking about!!)
2007-02-26 23:56:09 · 11 answers · asked by mzee_wa_kazi 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't understand why people are so excited about the name Jesus on a box. It was a ridiculously common name at that time. They were the Joe, Linda and Susan of their day.
Yes, this is exactly the kind of thing that wicked men will try to use to discredit Jesus Christ. Take heart in the fact that it cannot be done. That battle was won at the Cross. God bless.
2007-02-27 00:11:37 · answer #1 · answered by cmw 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why is it ridiculous that Jesus had a child?
Of course, I wouldn't expect anything different but an attempted cover up from the religious type of people. With all the technology we have today... Is has been bound to happen that one day religion will be proved wrong or incorrect.
To gwhiz1052: Why is it that we go to heaven and our bones stay behind but Jesus's bones don't? Don't make any sense...
2007-02-27 08:13:05 · answer #2 · answered by snugglesrn 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What would be wrong with Jesus having a son? He was sent as a "human form", therefore had all the human abilities, needs, desires and emotions. He loved a woman.
Why can't he be a prophet? Why must he be the son of god to be listened to? He had very valid philosophical and political points in his time. If we could accept it as that, with what we know today we could all lead much happier lives without the regulations of 2007 years ago!
2007-02-27 08:11:50 · answer #3 · answered by canguroargentino 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This is so stupid,and what the "find" was 30 years ago,they have had a long time to forged this.Jesus is in Heaven No bones,
no grave
2007-02-27 08:23:02 · answer #4 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, but if the same case had backed up something in the Bible, you would have this guy up for a Nobel Prize. He has a decent case if you would take a second to read it, or at least watch the documentary on Sunday. It isn't a slam dunk, but it is pretty solid.
2007-02-27 08:05:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
For anybody who has felt the presence of Christ, there is absolutely no reason to be bothered by this documentary, no matter the producers’ agenda. Bring it on. Truth will prevail.
2007-02-27 08:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Why am i not surprised that an obvious Christian would insist on limiting curiosity.
You speak as though you know everything that happened in Jesus' life. This simply is not true.
2007-02-27 08:08:10 · answer #7 · answered by William M 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
catholic are 100% false.catholic is like the snake that was in the story of the begin.now on earth catholic are the snake hiding the truth.why hide the truth.maybe they can help some how to stop the war in iraq.funny
2007-02-27 08:08:48 · answer #8 · answered by priscilla26 1 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Acts20:30....and from among YOU yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves.
2007-02-27 08:04:00 · answer #9 · answered by papa G 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
i agree with you 100% just the notion that Jesus had a child is ridiculous
2007-02-27 08:01:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋