2007-02-26 23:10:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
considering the situation about 1-2 because we need to stabilize and complete our traianing of Iraqi soldiers and police.
2007-02-26 23:13:40 · answer #1 · answered by Mike R 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It should be 2 to 5 years depending on the threat from Iran and the stability of Iraqi government. The US will have to create a treaty because of the alliance between Russia and Iran, every super power is creating pacts with oil rich nations, this will be ours. They have discovered new oil fields in Iraq that make this country more oil rich than Saudi Arabia.
2007-02-27 07:28:48 · answer #2 · answered by frosty62 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you referring to the troops or to the US involvement? If you are referring to the troops, we will always have troops there and will likely have a permanent base there. As for our involvement - count on it being a permanent thing. We can't just walk away now that we have completely disrupted the country. It's a no-win situation.
2007-02-27 07:23:09 · answer #3 · answered by north79004487 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are still in Germany, Korea, Panama, Japan....need I say more? The middle east will never find peace.
2007-02-27 08:22:03 · answer #4 · answered by jean25 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
might be 4 to 5 years
2007-02-27 07:15:22 · answer #5 · answered by dhoom_machao_dhoom 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
At least until Bush leaves office.
2007-02-27 07:51:38 · answer #6 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Less than we have been in Germany and Japan after that war.
2007-02-27 07:15:46 · answer #7 · answered by e.sillery 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think we will always have troops there. Look at Korea. We still have troops there.
2007-02-27 10:28:07 · answer #8 · answered by cavwife 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who knows, but my plan is build a small nuclear bomb and bomb Iraq (after all our troops are out)
so none of the blast or radiation effects Israel (our ally)
2007-02-27 07:14:08 · answer #9 · answered by Eng 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Around two.
2007-02-27 07:42:29 · answer #10 · answered by David R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋