I'm sorry, the anwer to this question is obvious but I just can't help myself any longer. Have so many of you had so little education that you do not understand the difference between these things? Please understand that they are three different explanations for three different things. They are not linked except in the most liberal of senses and if you really want to know why so many of us believe them, you honestly need to read, learn and understand.
2007-02-26 15:23:49 · 10 answers · asked by Huggles-the-wise 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, I do. And I hate having to beat the fundies off with a stick of education.
2007-02-26 15:31:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes
The three of them together make up the scientific theory of the universe as we know it.
Unfortunately there are no proofs, just a few experiments that produced some intriguing results.
Now, the big question to you, is were you aware the Big Bang theory came from a Catholic Priest.
Were you aware that most of the important proofs of evolution came from a Catholic Abbot who is the father of modern Genetics.
The main issue still gets back to the things no one can prove.
Intellegent design VS serendipty
There IS one thing EVEYRONE has to admit: Science is ALL about intellegent design.
Science, by it's nature, never leaves anything to chance.
TV sets do not grow on trees.
It is by our nature and totally self evident that everything we have today comes as a result of intellegent design and we have given up the ways of nature, the ways of the tribal man, the simple life.
In favor of the warm, comforting rewards of Intellegent Design.
Obvioiusly Intellegent Design is the way to go!
It is PLAIN to anyone that INTELLEGENT DESIGN wins over serendipty.
2007-02-26 23:53:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes I do...but I am by no means an expert in any of those...but I do understand the differences. Great question btw.
2007-02-26 23:30:22 · answer #3 · answered by Stormilutionist Chasealogist 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are 3 Atheistic religious theories of Creation? All running contrary to Ex Nilho Creationism, as written in Gen1-2.
2007-02-26 23:28:58 · answer #4 · answered by kmsbean 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is all part of the naturalistic (atheistic) model of how we came into being honey. It is a vital part to the atheistic worldview yet It is nothing more than a model of creation that does not involve God.
2007-02-26 23:38:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, I do understand, in the abstract, what each of those are. Although I'm not a cosmologist or biologist.
2007-02-26 23:27:10 · answer #6 · answered by Contemplative Monkey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thumbs up!
2007-02-26 23:28:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your words will more than likely fall on deaf ears.
I can guarantee you we're going to get more stupid questions from people who want info from 'evolutionists', whatever the hell those are.
2007-02-26 23:27:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-26 23:30:40 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK. Change the Category to science.
2007-02-26 23:39:01 · answer #10 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋