Timothy B, my sincere congratulations.
People are starting to wake up, at least it seems so in the UK. This side of the pond most still have their head in the sand, hoping for the best.
All railroad operations are at risk. Creating a MAJOR problem is nearly as easy as has been said. A pickup truck (small lorry) with three guys, some heavy tools and other conventional stuff available at your local hardware store and some motivation can scatter a train all over the place any time they want.
I've been chiming away on this matter at length with no interest by any listener. I know what I am talking about. One can agree with my words or disagree with my words, but you had better not ignore them.
People must get involved in this instance. Our respective governments are doing nothing that I am aware of to further protection of our nations' railroads, but even if they wanted to, not every mile of railroad can be protected.
That is why, if you see something that doesn't look right, SPEAK. It is a better thing to be incorrect and be thought foolish than it is to realize, post disaster, that you saw it happening, didn't recognize it and didn't report it. This one won't be done for us. We can only do it ourselves.
2007-02-26 15:29:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Samurai Hoghead 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt it very much. It would take some time and the chances are that such an individual would have been see by a passing train driver. Particularly, at Potter's Bar the line is very busy with trains passing every 5 minutes or so. Chances are that some one working illegally on the railway as suggested would have been splattered for, if working alone, they would not have been able to keep a proper look out. Don't believe in conspiracy theories, rather in totally poor maintenance and oversight of works being done, which is far more serious.
2007-02-26 21:46:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by rdenig_male 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
At the moment there is no evidence to say if there was tampering or not. As for that piece of line being near the M6 try a good 10 mile walk across rough country, that is why at this moment a temporary road is having to be built to be able to remove the damaged train. So no you are not right. Anyway we will have to wait and see what the final conclusions are from the investigators.
2007-02-26 23:28:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joolz of Salopia 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There might paradoxically be a crumb of comfort in being able to attribute such things to a "nutter", someone completely unhinged - but it could be more sobering than that: the inexorable dehumanisation caused by overexposure to the virtual realities of a million zaps on a computer game, coupled with the rapid erosion, for some, of any sense of personal responsibility - and the bad old lust for power.
2007-02-26 17:10:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by ivallrod 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No.
The consequences of this points fault would not have been predictable. Some trains may have passed over these points without detrimental effect.
The sort of nutter who would do that sort of thing would require planning and forward thinking, and would probably have done something with more certain results, such as drive a wagon on to the tracks.
2007-02-26 21:39:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
We'll have to wait a while for the answer, although we are being told it was the points at fault.
What i can't understand though is that these points seem to be 'trailing' ie to get onto another line, you would have to reverse over them. So it shouldn't affect a train going in the direction the said train was travelling. Also, if, they were at fault ,it should have shown up in the signalbox!
2007-02-27 02:26:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
springing up a injury in the rail could "knock the alerts down" right here in the U. S., which potential it may turn the alerts governing that extend of track "pink" or provide up. Trains intending previous a sign exhibiting a "provide up" indication proceed at "constrained velocity," which in fact potential a velocity which will enable the engineer to provide up the prepare interior of a million/2 the form of inventive and prescient, in need of something. in case you're attempting to pile up a prepare as a terrorist act, slicing the rail is a foul determination. regrettably, they already be responsive to that. the perfect interest getter the place passenger (or freight) trains is in contact is a stable ol' bomb. pay interest on your fellow visitors, and communicate up in case you notice something out of the traditional. i could fairly be concept a "nut" for being incorrect some checklist fairly than stay with the understanding my state of being inactive value a number of lives, in simple terms as state of being inactive did while it value 32 lives at Virginia Tech the day earlier to this. God Bless.
2016-10-02 01:28:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's also partly the industry's fault itself.
Why do we need ever faster trains ? Whats with the need for these trains which do 125mph + ?
I'd rather have a train doing 70 or 80 mph if it increases survival chances on tracks which can have bad points or curves or whatever... or signals for that matter. Lets be honest... the British can't do lasting rail work, just like we can't make lifts (elevators).
2007-02-26 14:53:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joe Bloggs 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I doubt you £30 tools from Halfords would be up to the job: All load-bearing railway hardware is quite substantial and would need substantial tools.
2007-03-01 12:34:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a possibility. In fact, I've always thought that the recent spate of car accidents in Northern Ireland is more than a coincidence...
2007-02-26 14:32:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋