English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-26 14:05:13 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

In response to chris

I have two words -- Guerilla warfare.

2007-02-26 14:23:00 · update #1

10 answers

O.K...
Think about this...
The U.S.A has a huge population and if they wanted to they could force their people into the military under the D.N.O.S.T or Desperate Need of Supporting Troops act allowing any country that could justify a war the right to recruit all persons over the legal age for warfare...
This will probably ensure the U.S.A's war mongering ability for a very long time...
Plus there is the fact of the U.S's endless supplies of tanks and fighting aircraft...
there is simply no match to the U.S any longer no one can really stand up to them alone...

2007-02-27 01:22:28 · answer #1 · answered by Buster 3 · 0 0

If they have a 3rd war on the go at the same time (eg Syria, NK, Somalia or Iran), they will probably start to feel quite stretched out then. But then again, they would probably go back to using mostly bomber planes and secret agents instead of uniformed footsoldiers. But until the rest of the world puts together a convincing case that the US will be isolated from trade (or nuked) if it doesn't behave, it is likely to continue with the above 4 + current two, and then also go back to Cuba, Venezuela, & other strategic overthrows.

2007-02-26 20:41:49 · answer #2 · answered by Wise Kai 3 · 0 0

You do not need solgers for New Clear war, you get enemy own force casualty ratios approaching 1 000 000 to 0 and it is very cost effective as the newkes are already in stock.
New Clear is the way to go, (Same as nuclear, but new, like new Labour)

2007-02-26 14:21:47 · answer #3 · answered by Timothy B 1 · 0 1

i dont know i think that all of our soldiers are great but i guess some people feel that all the other contries need help or something and then there we go again but some of the action has needed to be taken but a lot hasent.

2007-02-26 14:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by tj 2 · 0 0

It is not like that at all. It is how many wars do you have to start before you realize that you are a bully and that you are just hurting the people of this nation and those of the nation(s) that we would be fighting.

2007-02-26 14:13:24 · answer #5 · answered by darkhelmet29 2 · 0 2

Are you even in the military, because I am, and that is one of the dumbest questions Ive ever heard.

2007-02-26 14:12:16 · answer #6 · answered by Chris 1 · 1 0

If you are truely concerned, you should enlist in the military and help out.

2007-02-26 14:21:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

without war the US military industries will be collapse.

2007-02-26 17:38:42 · answer #8 · answered by Difi 4 · 0 0

you forgot to add blair to your list.

2007-02-26 23:22:52 · answer #9 · answered by earl 5 · 0 0

Huh????

2007-02-26 14:08:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers