Who agree's that the country could be run by a woman but is better off being run by a man?

Answer 1

Depends on the man, and depends on the woman. Personally, given the choices we are about to make, I would be more comfortable with the men. It would be rather awkward to have a first gentleman washing the dishes. But again, what do I know?

Answer 2

First off, I am a woman.

There is some merit in your question. For instance the Middle East's attitude on woman would leave a female President in a much tougher position at this given point of time.

However, the answer is not as simple as your question was posed. I would not vote for Hillary, gender aside. I can't stand her. I would vote for Condi and I would vote for her over say, Al Gore as she would run the country much better than he.

There are some woman who can do a better job than some men and vice versa although at this given time a man would have it easier.

Answer 3

I do not agree. A woman's perspective could have many interesting and potentially beneficial effects. That being said NO woman is currently running for President. That ambition crazed double talking harpie is no more a woman than my rabid python Spike.

Answer 4

I definitely think the country could be run by a woman, just not by a Clinton again.

Answer 5

We women are femine flowers, we can't handle all the stress of war and the sorrow of the world on our shoulders, long ago war was ment for men only and men have all the mental and physical strnght inside of them. But yet im on the fence on that question because if there were a woman president there would be less likely to be war on earth.

Answer 6

From observing current events.
I believe it's already happening.
But not on a high scale just yet.

Answer 7

I think Oprah would make a great president.

Answer 8

I vote for Condi.